arXiv Computation and Language

DuSE-Bench: Benchmarking Joint Reasoning over Evolving Dialogue and Documents

DuSE-Bench is a new benchmark for evaluating how language models combine evolving dialogue and document facts to meet user requirements. It contains 1,000 tasks across five scenarios, with 700 tasks requiring premises from both dialogue and documents, and uses an evolving Support Graph to track changes and evidence links. Experiments on 11 baseline models show that joint reasoning remains difficult, with accuracy on jointly grounded tasks at most 56.7% and frequent attribution errors.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 2

TrajWiki: Source-Grounded Memory Trajectories for Long-Horizon Dialogue Agents

Large language model agents have shown strong capabilities in generating coherent and contextually appropriate responses, yet robust long-horizon dialogue remains limited by the lack of external memory that is traceable, updatable, and diagnostically transparent. Existing memory-augmented agents often store memories as isolated records or overwritable states, making it difficult to preserve how information originates, evolves, conflicts, or becomes obsolete over time.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 23

REFACT: Adaptive Fact Restatement for Compact and Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Large language models increasingly rely on long-form reasoning for complex tasks, yet their reasoning traces may drift away from the supplied context when evidence is sparse, noisy, or in conflict with parametric knowledge. Existing grounding methods either attach citations after generation or encourage evidence retrieval inside the trace, but they often do not ensure that cited content is sufficient for the local inference and final answer.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

Parametric Knowledge in RAG-SFT for Domain-Specific Document Generation

The paper investigates Retrieval-Augmented Generation fine‑tuning (RAG‑SFT) for generating requirements documents in electronics engineering, comparing two 7B models trained with different data strategies. It introduces a claim‑based evaluation pipeline, C‑FEX, and a new metric, Parametric Knowledge Precision (PKP), to assess factuality of model‑generated claims. Results show that fine‑tuned 7B models can match or surpass a 72B baseline, but standard metrics may mislead, and fine‑tuning reduces hallucination by encouraging more reliable use of parametric knowledge.

By Julian Oestreich, Maximilian Bley, Frank Binder, Lydia M\"uller, Andr\'e Alcalde, Maksym Sydorenkoq
arXiv AI
Aug 5

DocTrace: Towards Traceable Long Document VQA via Hierarchical Evidence Graph Reasoning

arXiv:2608. 03292v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long Document Visual Question Answering (LongDocVQA) requires Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to locate, integrate, and reason over heterogeneous document elements distributed across multiple pages.

By Le Xiang, Zhicheng Guan, Hong Chen, Xiaocong Lin, Zhenghua Lei, Teng Hu, Bolei He, Long Zeng
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

UTILMEM: Benchmarking Evidence Utilization in Long-Term Conversational Memory

UTILMEM is a new diagnostic benchmark that tests how conversational agents use long‑term memory, focusing on reasoning over dense histories, spotting implicitly relevant memories, synthesizing distributed evidence, and resisting interference from similar distractors. It contains 1,717 instances across five domains and evaluates a range of retrieval‑based and memory‑augmented systems. The study shows that strong performance on traditional factual recall does not guarantee effective memory utilization, highlighting a gap between retrieving information and integrating it into coherent, task‑oriented outputs.

By Peijun Qing, Fobo Shi, Soroush Vosoughi