Three-Body Scattering for Generative Modeling
arXiv:2607. 18198v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern generative models typically rely on an adversarial critic, a prescribed noise-to-data path, or an autoregressive factorization.
Modern generative models typically rely on an adversarial critic, a prescribed noise-to-data path, or an autoregressive factorization. Instead, we show that a proper distributional energy can induce sample-level motion and provide direct regression supervision for a one-step generator.
arXiv:2607. 18198v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern generative models typically rely on an adversarial critic, a prescribed noise-to-data path, or an autoregressive factorization.
The paper introduces TDAction, a method for one‑step generative modeling that selects transport targets during training based on a cost reflecting shared‑parameter effort and terminal mismatch. By formulating this as a soft‑terminal control problem, the authors derive a closed‑form Batch Tangent Action‑to‑Go value that captures cross‑sample interactions and can be efficiently implemented with randomized tangent probes. Experiments on ImageNet 256×256 demonstrate that TDAction achieves an FID below 1.1 without distillation.
The paper presents a new one‑step generative modeling framework for finite state spaces, leveraging discrete Wasserstein geometry to define a target‑relative KL gradient flow over a reversible Markov kernel. The authors implement this flow at the particle level using Markov jumps and encode the resulting transport updates into a latent‑conditioned generator, enabling one‑step inference after training. Experiments on a controlled setting confirm KL dissipation, consistency between particle dynamics and probability flow, and accurate numerical scaling, while a finite‑capacity neural generator successfully tracks the exact transport targets.
arXiv:2608. 11544v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose CVaR-penalized Generative Particle Algorithm (CVaR-GPA), a robust, tail-agnostic algorithm for fine-tuning generative models to learn heavy-tailed distributions and capture extreme events, requiring no prior knowledge or estimation of the target's tail characteristics.
arXiv:2608. 19540v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training fast generators on new domains with limited data remains challenging for two reasons.
arXiv:2609.35763v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Distributional training provides collective supervision for one-step visual generation by matching real and generated features in frozen representa...
Training fast generators on new domains with limited data remains challenging for two reasons. First, adapting a pretrained diffusion or flow model to a new domain leaves its costly multi-step sampling unaddressed, and existing acceleration methods are tied to the source parameterization--$ε$, $x$, $v$, or $u$--leaving heterogeneous pretrained models with no common acceleration target.
arXiv:2609.37147v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Distributional Diffusion Models (DDMs) replace the standard mean-prediction denoiser with a \emph{distributional} denoiser trained via a scoring rule...
arXiv:2607. 27372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The deep learning revolution, kicked off by AlexNet, taught us that end-to-end training beats decomposing a problem into hand-designed stages.
arXiv:2606. 08953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern generative models often define an entire probability path from a simple prior to the data law, rather than only an endpoint map.
arXiv:2602.15396v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion models often yield highly curved trajectories and noisy score targets due to an uninformative, memoryless forward process that induces in...
The paper introduces Probability‑Flow Distillation (PFD), a new method for matching parameter distributions in diffusion‑based models. It extends the particle variational inference framework of Variational Score Distillation to Score Distillation Sampling (SDS) and Score Distillation via Inversion (SDI), revealing that SDS focuses on mode collapse while SDI converges to a contracted distribution. By replacing a single Euler step in SDI with a full reverse probability‑flow ODE solve and simplifying the gradient, PFD achieves distribution matching with only a forward ODE solve, and experiments on synthetic data, CelebA, and text‑to‑3D tasks confirm its effectiveness.