arXiv:2610.28512v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Unresolved atmospheric processes can introduce history dependence beyond the short input windows used by many weather forecasting models. We introduce...
By Ilya Vilkoviskiy, Liang-Hong Mo, Suozhi Huang, Dmitry A. Abanin
Unresolved atmospheric processes can introduce history dependence beyond the short input windows used by many weather forecasting models. We introduce GraphCast--Mamba, which augments a frozen, pretra...
arXiv:2504. 20238v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Atmospheric predictability research has long held that rapid error growth at small spatial scales imposes an intrinsic limit of roughly two weeks on deterministic weather forecast skill.
By P. Trent Vonich, Gregory J. Hakim
The paper presents Laxmi, a retrained version of the AIFS weather model that uses satellite-based precipitation observations instead of ERA5 reanalysis data. Laxmi achieves a 19% improvement in global probabilistic accuracy, reduces drizzle overprediction by 33%, and boosts the 95th percentile Brier skill score by 57%. In a case study of 10 Indian tropical storms, Laxmi accurately forecasted 150 mm event-total precipitation in 7 events, outperforming both the original AIFS and the leading physical model IFS.
By Julian F. Schmitt, Bertrand Delorme, Robert C. King, Yashica Patodia, Tapio Schneider, Aditi Sheshadri, Ravi Jain
arXiv:2606. 06348v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The paradigm of global weather forecasting is rapidly shifting with the emergence of Machine Learning Weather Prediction models (MLWP).
By Wolfgang R. Rowell Jr., Lucas S. Kupssinsk\"u
The paradigm of global weather forecasting is rapidly shifting with the emergence of Machine Learning Weather Prediction models (MLWP). While these data-driven architectures demonstrate remarkable global skill, regional benchmarks in the Global South remain scarce, leaving their efficacy in complex, highly convective environments largely unverified.
arXiv:2607. 05658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), best known for positioning, also serve weather science, as atmospheric water vapour delays their signals.
By Leonardo Trentini, Fanny Lehmann, Laura Crocetti, Benedikt Soja
The paper presents a spatiotemporal graph neural network that predicts global fire radiative power (FRP) up to seven days ahead using recent observations and reanalysis data. Trained on 2020‑2022 data and evaluated for 2023‑2024, the model reproduces the seasonal FRP cycle and outperforms persistence, reducing mean squared error by 32–43% at one‑day lead and 24–40% at seven days at 0.1° resolution. While large fires are reliably detected, the model underestimates their radiative power and faces challenges in intensity calibration and small‑fire placement.
By Li Zhang, Jun Wang, Isidora Jankov, Yongxin Liu, Gonzalo A. Ferrada, Ravan Ahmadov, Ligia Bernardet, Haonan Chen, Shobha Kondragunta
The paper presents a hierarchical ensemble for short‑term photovoltaic power forecasting that fuses temporal neural models, historical analogs, state climatology, and gradient‑boosted trees with horizon‑specific convex weights. Solar geometry and numerical weather forecasts provide expected generation conditions, while a calibration step corrects recent bias using historical forecast errors. Evaluated on PVDAQ and GEFCom2014 data, the ensemble reduces mean absolute error by up to 6% compared to strong individual models, though its advantage varies with dataset and horizon.
By Xu Yuqing, Zhou Liguo, Sun Ze, Yu Lei, Jiang Mingming
arXiv:2608. 09972v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: First-generation AI weather models are often reported to underperform at extremes, mostly in reanalysis-based evaluations of deterministic regression systems.
By Marvin Vincent Gabler, Roberto Molinaro, Niall Siegenheim, Henry Martin, Mark Frey, Niels Poulsen, Philipp Seitz, Olivier Lam
The study evaluates three machine‑learning weather‑prediction models—FourCastNet3, GraphCast, and the ECMWF High‑Resolution Forecast—for wind‑speed forecasting in Northern Norway using multi‑year station data. Results show the ECMWF model slightly outperforms the ML models (RMSE 2.89 m s⁻¹ vs. 2.96 m s⁻¹ for FourCastNet3 and 2.94 m s⁻¹ for GraphCast), yet all models maintain comparable performance beyond their training periods and underestimate strong winds. FourCastNet3 performs best under high‑wind conditions, indicating ML models are competitive with traditional numerical weather prediction but still need improvement for complex terrain.
By Siyan Chen, Lars Uebbing, Eirik Mikal Samuelsen, Georgios Leontidis, Arnt-B{\o}rre Salberg, S\'ebastien Lef\`evre, Robert Jenssen, Kristoffer Wickstr{\o}m
arXiv:2609.15049v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: An ensemble can improve photovoltaic forecasts while adding components that contribute little or increase computation. We assess these effects throug...
By Sun Ze, Zhou Liguo, Xu Yuqing, Yu Lei, Jiang Mingming