arXiv:2607. 10312v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid proliferation of online polarization threatens social cohesion, necessitating robust automated detection systems that operate effectively across diverse linguistic contexts.
By Muhammad Abdullahi Said
arXiv:2606. 20255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce the Meaning Intelligence Framework (MIF), a nine-dimension annotation and evaluation schema for Nigerian public discourse that separates surface sentiment from true communicative intent.
By Celestine Achi
arXiv:2606. 03304v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated in multilingual settings, yet their inference behavior in low-resource African languages remains underexplored especially under pure prompting without fine-tuning.
By Anuj Tiwari, Terry Oko-odion, Hannah Nwokocha
arXiv:2606.27314v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: To avoid moderation and surveillance on social media, some users routinely invent indirect linguistic expressions (ILE) that camouflage sensitive m...
By Hamid Reza Firoozfar, Mohammadsadegh Abolhasani, Reza Mousavi, Paul Jen-Hwa Hu
arXiv:2609.36194v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Extracted sentiment directions can vary across samples even when downstream sentiment classification remains accurate. To evaluate direction reproducib...
By Muhammad Abdullahi Said, Abass Oguntade, Elisha Komolafe, Babangida Sani, Fatima Muhammad Adam, Muhammad Sammani Sani
The paper introduces STAR‑Ar, a BERT‑BiLSTM‑CRF model designed for the Daleel 2026 Arabic argument mining shared task. It treats argument discourse unit detection and classification as a token‑level sequence labeling problem, achieving an F1‑score of 72.69 on validation and 73.7 on test data. Analysis shows that models trained only on editorial texts perform worse than those trained on debates, mainly due to the smaller editorial dataset.
By Bhuvanesh Verma, Ali Abusaleh, Alexander Mehler
arXiv:2606. 05486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prompt ambiguity is a common source of failure in large language models, but is difficult to localize because it is a latent property of the prompt, while existing attribution methods are designed to explain observable outputs such as logits or generated tokens.
By Govind Ramesh, Yao Dou, Wei Xu
arXiv:2608.22922v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We present HelaBERT, a family of two BERT-based masked language models pre-trained from scratch on approximately 1 billion tokens of Sinhala text sourc...
By Thisen Ekanayake, Nisansa de Silva
arXiv:2609.27811v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Online platforms have become arenas for the public contestation of climate change, shaping how scientific knowledge, denial, and uncertainty are expr...
By Daniel Morais, Diego H. M. Magalhaes, Gabriel H. Silva, Andrea Failla, Valeria de C. Santos, Helen C. S. C. Lima, Carlos H. G. Ferreira
The paper presents a survey of 129 public large language model (LLM) prompt datasets, totaling over 1.22 TB and 673 million instances, and introduces a unified taxonomy for them. By analyzing seven datasets in depth, the authors identify lexical, syntactic, and semantic patterns that differentiate prompts from general text, and evaluate these patterns for tasks such as prompt filtering, source domain routing, and response quality assessment. They demonstrate that a 63‑dimensional linguistic feature set extracted on a CPU can match over 91 % of the F1 score of GPU‑based sentence embeddings while halving latency, and that structural features can effectively route prompts across datasets, though they may negatively impact response quality when prompt length is controlled.
By Yuanming Zhang, Yan Lin, Arijit Khan, Huaiyu Wan
arXiv:2607. 05554v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Survey-style evaluations of large language models often treat a prompted response as a measure of a model's values or beliefs.
By Sadia Kamal, Arefa Patwary, Anthony Marchiafava, Atriya Sen, Sagnik Ray Choudhury
The paper introduces SimpCue, a cue-based prompting approach for multilingual text simplification in Catalan, Spanish, and Italian. It compares three prompting strategies—baseline, gold-cue (with gold linguistic cues), and predicted-cue (with automatically predicted cues)—using the Qwen3-8B model. Results show that predicted-cue prompting yields the best overall scores across SARI, BLEU, chrF, and BERTScore, though gains over the baseline are modest and vary by language.
By Mehrzad Tareh, Horacio Saggion, Stefan Bott