arXiv:2607. 15480v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly impact society, ensuring their ethical and trustworthy deployment has become a global priority.
By Michael Papademas, Xenia Ziouvelou, Kostas Karpouzis, Vangelis Karkaletsis
arXiv:2606. 09006v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Both digital economy and digital technology researchers increasingly recognize the need to better address the role that artificial intelligence (AI) plays in shaping the evolution of the environmental, social and governance aspects of development.
By Han-Teng Liao, Zijia Wang
arXiv:2508. 09219v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in AI applications have raised growing concerns about the need for ethical guidelines and regulations to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies.
By Wilder Baldwin, Sepideh Ghanavati, Manuel Woersdoerfer
arXiv:2606. 00038v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly recognized as a foundational competency for all university graduates.
By J. Paul Liu, Rachel Levy
arXiv:2607. 14782v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Grounded in human rights-based frameworks such as the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI) examines how countries translate responsible AI commitments into enforceable protections, institutional capacity, and redress mechanisms.
By Rachel Adams, Fola Adeleke, Ayantola Alayande, Selamawit Engida Abdella, Ana Florido, Nicol\'as Grossman, Leah Junck
The article applies an Education-Centered AI Policy Framework to Ghana’s National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025‑2035, examining six key components such as teacher agency, curriculum, and responsible AI. It finds the strategy ambitious in promoting AI literacy, youth skills, and rural outreach, yet it falls short on school‑level implementation, teacher preparation, and culturally responsive pedagogy. The authors highlight concerns about transparency, coherence, and the need for a sector‑specific policy that links workforce readiness with classroom practice and learner protection.
By Matthew Nyaaba, Vida Awinime Bugri, Eric Kojo Majialuwe, Bismark Nyaaba Akanzire, Ibrahim Nantomah, Felicia Boateng, Patrick Kyeremeh, Benjamin Quarshie, Ellen Kwarteng, Macharious Nabang
arXiv:2502. 20016v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sustainability encompasses three key facets: economic, environmental, and social.
By Pedram Bakhtiarifard, P{\i}nar T\"oz\"un, Christian Igel, Raghavendra Selvan
arXiv:2607. 07612v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving from generative systems to agentic AI capable of autonomously planning and executing tasks.
By Mubarak Raji, Masooda Bashir
arXiv:2608. 07475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) presents a governance challenge for STEM assessment.
By Yizhu Gao, Zhongzhou Chen, Min Li, Xiaoming Zhai
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has entered classrooms faster than teachers have been prepared to use it well, producing a GenAI literacy lag in which technological diffusion outpaces educators' conceptual, pedagogical, and ethical readiness. Established AI literacy frameworks predate the widespread adoption of large language models and, while acknowledging ethics, position it as a discrete competency rather than a constitutive commitment, with equity and agency as supplementary design principles.
OpenAI funds 14 independent projects exploring new AI policy ideas to expand economic opportunity and strengthen societal resilience in the Intelligence Age.
The paper titled "Lost in Translation: How Universal Ethical Values Fail to Translate Across Global Contexts" examines how AI ethics frameworks that assume values such as fairness, transparency, and accountability are universal actually differ in practice. By interviewing 14 experts from 10 countries, the authors find that these values are reinterpreted to fit local moral logics—privacy becomes collective, transparency becomes trust‑building, and fairness becomes equity in access—revealing translation gaps between global frameworks and local practices. The study proposes plural governance pathways that redistribute epistemic authority and treat ethical negotiation as an ongoing, context‑sensitive process.
By Ozioma C. Oguine, Munachimso B. Oguine, Cesar Cervera, Jenny Yang, Pooja Voladoddi, Mario Rodriguez, Saif Eddin Bani Malhem, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Daricia Wilkinson