arXiv Machine Learning

CacheDyG: Decoupling Temporal Propagation for Efficient Dynamic Graph Learning

CacheDyG introduces a cache‑refine framework that decouples temporal propagation from parameter updates in dynamic graph neural networks. By storing graph‑aware node‑time representations in non‑trainable buffers and updating only a lightweight refiner, residual gate, and link predictor during training, it reduces repeated recomputation of historical structures. Experiments on five benchmarks show that CacheDyG uses fewer trainable parameters, runs faster, and achieves competitive or better predictive performance compared to existing baselines.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17

What Do Temporal Graph Learning Models Learn?

arXiv:2510. 09416v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning on temporal graphs has become a central topic in graph representation learning, with numerous benchmarks indicating the strong performance of state-of-the-art models.

By Abigail J. Hayes, Tobias Schumacher, Markus Strohmaier
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 7

When GNNs Fail: Quantifying and Overcoming Temporal Correlation Volatility in Time Series

Modeling multivariate time series by representing them as graphs, where individual series act as nodes and pairwise temporal corre- lations serve as edges, has gained significant traction. Recent advances in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated strong perfor- mance by assuming a static graph topology and aggregating information from neighboring series.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

SiST-GNN: Simultaneous Spatial-Temporal Message Passing for Dynamic Graph Representation Learning

SiST‑GNN introduces a simultaneous spatial‑temporal message‑passing framework for dynamic graph neural networks, fusing per‑node temporal embeddings with spatial aggregation in a single operation. By maintaining a recurrent hidden state per node and treating it as a cross‑time edge, the model jointly reasons over topology and evolution. Experiments on link‑prediction and node‑classification benchmarks show significant improvements over prior methods, achieving up to 158% gains in live‑update link prediction and outperforming discrete‑time baselines by 7–23% in dynamic node classification.

By Shubhajit Roy, Anirban Dasgupta