arXiv AI

\textsc{DiARC}: Distinguishing Positive and Negative Samples Helps Improving ARC-like Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 26530v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC;~\citealp{chollet2019measure}) contains tasks that require summarizing patterns from limited grid samples and predicting output grids.

arXiv AI

Jun 29

DiARC: Distinguishing Positive and Negative Samples Helps Improving ARC-like Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 26530v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) contains tasks that require summarizing patterns from limited grid samples and predicting output grids.

By Yuxuan Yang, Feiyang Li, Yile Wang

llms fine-tuning benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 17

Step-Tagging: Toward controlling the generation of Language Reasoning Models through step monitoring

arXiv:2512. 14332v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The field of Language Reasoning Models (LRMs) has been very active over the past few years with advances in training and inference techniques enabling LRMs to reason longer, and more accurately.

By Yannis Belkhiter, Seshu Tirupathi, Giulio Zizzo, John D. Kelleher

benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 15

Implicit Reasoning for Large Language Model-based Generative Recommendation

arXiv:2606. 14142v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted as backbones for Generative Recommendation (GR), promising access to pretrained world knowledge.

By Yinhan He, Liam Collins, Bhuvesh Kumar, Jundong Li, Neil Shah, Donald Loveland

llms rag safety

arXiv AI

Jun 24

Rule2Text: A Framework for Generating and Evaluating Natural Language Explanations of Knowledge Graph Rules

arXiv:2508. 10971v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Knowledge graphs (KGs) can be enhanced through rule mining; however, the resulting logical rules are often difficult for humans to interpret due to their inherent complexity and the idiosyncratic labeling conventions of individual KGs.

By Nasim Shirvani-Mahdavi, Chengkai Li

llms fine-tuning

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 11

Rethinking Reasoning with MDLMs: Early Exits, Post-hoc Reasoning, and Beyond

arXiv:2510. 19990v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The reasoning paradigm, where language models reason before answering, has enabled breakthroughs on tasks such as mathematical problem-solving.

By Zachary Horvitz, Raghav Singhal, Hao Zou, Carles Domingo-Enrich, Zhou Yu, Rajesh Ranganath, Kathleen McKeown

llms diffusion reinforcement-learning fine-tuning

arXiv AI

Jun 3

Fixing FOLIO and MALLS: Verified Annotations and an LLM-assisted Framework to Focus Human Relabeling

arXiv:2606. 02837v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate translation from Natural Language to First-Order Logic (NL-to-FOL) underpins neurosymbolic AI systems and Natural Language Inference (NLI), making the quality of NL-to-FOL benchmarks essential -- yet these datasets have never been rigorously audited.

By Andrea Brunello, Cristian Curaba, Luca Geatti, Michele Mignani, Angelo Montanari, Nicola Saccomanno

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 12

LLMs as ASP Programmers: Self-Correction Enables Task-Agnostic Nonmonotonic Reasoning

arXiv:2604. 27960v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive reasoning milestones but continue to struggle with high computational costs, logical inconsistencies, and sharp performance degradation on high-complexity problems.

By Adam Ishay, Joohyung Lee

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 23

Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models

arXiv:2607. 19847v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting missing cell values in tabular data is a fundamental problem in data cleaning.

By Yurong Liu, Yeye He, Haoyu Dong, Junjie Xing, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang, Surajit Chaudhuri

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 11

Toward Preference-aligned Large Language Models via Residual-based Model Steering

arXiv:2509. 23982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Preference alignment is a critical step in making Large Language Models (LLMs) useful and aligned with (human) preferences.

By Lucio La Cava, Andrea Tagarelli

llms reinforcement-learning benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jun 12

Representing Time Series as Structured Programs for LLM Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 12481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and instruction-following capabilities, making them potentially powerful tools for time-series analysis.

By Jaeho Kim, Changhun Oh, Seokhyun Lee, Irina Rish, Changhee Lee

llms nlp

arXiv AI

Jul 10

Rethinking LLM-as-a-Judge: Representation-as-a-Judge with Small Language Models via Semantic Capacity Asymmetry

arXiv:2601. 22588v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as reference-free evaluators via prompting, but this "LLM-as-a-Judge" paradigm is costly, opaque, and sensitive to prompt design.

By Zhuochun Li, Yong Zhang, Ming Li, Yuelyu Ji, Yiming Zeng, Ning Cheng, Yun Zhu, Yanmeng Wang, Shaojun Wang, Jing Xiao, Daqing He

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 13

GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMs

arXiv:2507. 18043v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time steering methods offer a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) by modifying internal activations at test time without updating model weights.

By Duy Nguyen, Archiki Prasad, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal

llms fine-tuning multimodal safety

Related stories