arXiv:2511. 19716v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) often slows in the late stage of training due to anisotropic curvature and gradient noise.
By Mitchell Scott, Tianshi Xu, Ziyuan Tang, Alexandra Pichette-Emmons, Qiang Ye, Yousef Saad, Yuanzhe Xi
The paper studies how different optimizers perform as training duration (overtraining) increases, focusing on matrix‑preconditioned methods (Muon, SOAP) and a momentum‑scheduled method (ADANA) compared to AdamW. Across models ranging from 51M to 253M parameters and overtraining factors up to 256×, the authors find that optimal learning‑rate schedules, weight‑decay coefficients, and memory settings shift with horizon, and that ADANA consistently outperforms AdamW, especially with log‑time weight decay and momentum cooldown. Muon and SOAP maintain roughly constant token‑efficiency advantages, with SOAP potentially improving at the highest overtraining levels.
By Katie Everett, Shikai Qiu
arXiv:2607. 12360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The cooldown phase of a warmup-stable-decay (WSD) learning-rate schedule, now a default in large-model pretraining, lowers the final training loss in some settings and does nothing in others.
By Subham Singh, Ashutosh Mishra, Subha Raut
arXiv:2608.29448v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often face ill-conditioned objectives that limit high-accuracy training. Dense quasi-Newton methods improve...
By Guangyuan Wang, Mads Toftrup, Sebastian Loeschcke, Yixuan Wang, Anima Anandkumar
arXiv:2609.38095v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Backpropagation (BP) dominates deep learning but imposes a massive memory tax. For example, training OPT-30B with Adam requires $\approx$ 600GB of GPU...
By Francois Chaubard, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Chris R\'e
arXiv:2605. 29547v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators.
By Ruoran Xu, Borong She, Xiaobo Jin, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv:2605.10335v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Adaptive optimizers such as Adam are standard for training Transformers, but storing gradient first and second moments incurs substantial mem...
By Yao Lu, Dengdong Fan, Shixun Zhang, Yonghong Tian
arXiv:2605. 23391v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for coupled multiphysics systems suffer systematic accuracy degradation as inter-equation coupling strengthens.
By Youngjae Park, Jaemin Kim, Junghwa Hong
arXiv:2607. 22906v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study adaptive gradient descent for continuously differentiable, possibly nonconvex objectives under one-sided H\"older regularity.
By Arzu Ahmadova, Ismail Huseynov
arXiv:2607. 26247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tunes large pretrained models at a fraction of the cost of full fine-tuning, but its performance depends strongly on how the adapters are initialized.
By Dianze Liu, Farshid Ghezelbash
StoSignSGD is a new sign‑based optimization algorithm that injects structural stochasticity into the sign operator, ensuring unbiased updates. It resolves the divergence issues of traditional SignSGD on non‑smooth objectives, achieving optimal convergence rates in convex settings and improved complexity bounds in non‑convex, non‑smooth problems. Empirical results show that StoSignSGD is stable and efficient across large language model training, outperforming AdamW and SignSGD in low‑precision regimes (FP8 and FP4) and delivering speedups and accuracy gains on models ranging from OLMo2‑370M to 7B LLMs.
By Dingzhi Yu, Rui Pan, Yuxing Liu, Difan Zou, Tong Zhang
arXiv:2608. 04407v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory-efficient matrix optimizers such as Sinkhorn gradient descent remove most AdamW optimizer state for dense Transformer matrices, but direct application to Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) training is unreliable.
By Masato Fujitake