arXiv Computation and Language

Are We Really Measuring Forgetting? Pitfalls in Evaluating Machine Unlearning for Multimodal LLMs

The paper discusses the rapid progress of machine unlearning for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and the need for rigorous evaluation. It identifies three pitfalls in current benchmarks: lack of held‑out evaluation, reliance on synthetic fine‑tuned knowledge, and unfair comparisons across methods. To address these issues, the authors propose GEMMU, a benchmark using real‑world knowledge and a principled protocol, and show that re‑evaluating existing methods under GEMMU uncovers significant generalization gaps.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

Does Forgetting Transfer Across Modalities? A Real-World Benchmark for Cross-Modal Knowledge Unlearning Evaluation

arXiv:2608. 03791v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs), like Large Language Models (LLMs), may memorize sensitive, copyrighted, or harmful knowledge from their pretraining corpora.

By Chunlin Liu, Junnian Chen, Haitong Jiang, Jianyu Zhao, Yingsen Pang, Jingchen Li, Jiabiao He, Youming Lu, Jinhe Bi, Yuntao Du
arXiv AI
Jul 10

Multimodal Unlearning Across Vision, Language, Video, and Audio: Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Benchmarks

arXiv:2607. 07907v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the growing adoption of VLMs, DMs, LLMs, and AFMs, these multimodal foundation models can inadvertently encode sensitive, copyrighted, biased, or unsafe cross-modal associations that originate from their training data.

By Nobin Sarwar, Shubhashis Roy Dipta, Zheyuan Liu, Vaidehi Patil