arXiv Machine Learning

Large Language Models: A Mathematical Formulation

arXiv:2601. 22170v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) process and predict sequences containing text to answer questions, and address tasks including document summarization, providing recommendations, writing software and solving quantitative problems.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

Just on Time: Token-Level Early Stopping for Diffusion Language Models

arXiv:2602. 11133v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion language models generate text through iterative refinement, a process that is often computationally inefficient because many tokens reach stability long before the final denoising step.

By Zakhar Kohut, Severyn Shykula, Mykola Vysotskyi, Serhii Dmytryshyn, Dmytro Khamula, Michal Zakrzewski, Damian Rynczak, Jacek Ma{\l}ecki, Taras Rumezhak, Volodymyr Karpiv
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4

Transmuting prompts into weights

arXiv:2510. 08734v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A growing body of research has demonstrated that the behavior of large language models can be effectively controlled at inference time by directly modifying their internal states, either through vector additions to their activations or through updates to their weight matrices.

By Hanna Mazzawi, Benoit Dherin, Michael Munn, Adrian Goldwaser, Michael Wunder, Javier Gonzalvo
OpenAI Blog
Feb 14, 2019

Better language models and their implications

We’ve trained a large-scale unsupervised language model which generates coherent paragraphs of text, achieves state-of-the-art performance on many language modeling benchmarks, and performs rudimentary reading comprehension, machine translation, question answering, and summarization—all without task-specific training.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 20

Token-Level Off-Policy Learning for Faithful Generation Under Distribution Shift

We propose Token-Level Off-Policy Labeling (TOPL), an off-policy training paradigm that reframes post-training as a token-level correctness prediction task. Our key intuition is that by training the model to distinguish good and bad tokens in a response, we naturally guide the model towards generating good tokens, while avoiding the pitfalls that come with directly training the model to generate off-policy tokens.