The paper introduces TP-CRIV, a framework for verifying the identity of AI models through third‑party challenge‑response interactions. It operates without white‑box or API access, relying only on black‑box inference and fresh, undisclosed challenges to gather empirical evidence of model possession. The authors demonstrate the method on ten ImageNet‑pretrained CNNs, achieving clear separation between matching and non‑matching models with statistically calibrated thresholds.
The paper introduces CertDW, a certified dataset watermark and ownership verification method that remains reliable even under malicious perturbations. By leveraging conformal prediction, it defines two statistical measures—principal probability (PP) and watermark robustness (WR)—to evaluate model stability on benign versus watermarked samples. The authors derive certification conditions linking WR to a PP-based threshold and provide a high‑probability bound on false positives, enabling robust ownership verification when a suspicious model’s WR exceeds the PP values of benign models.
By Ting Qiao, Yiming Li, Jianbin Li, Yingjia Wang, Leyi Qi, Junfeng Guo, Ruili Feng, Dacheng Tao
arXiv:2503.05794v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Speaker verification models are trained on large-scale public datasets whose licenses usually prohibit unauthorized commercial use, yet such...
By Yiming Li, Kaiying Yan, Jiawen Diao, Shuo Shao, Tongqing Zhai, Shu-Tao Xia, Dacheng Tao
arXiv:2510. 10982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent AI regulations increasingly emphasize the need for mechanisms that preserve the utility of data for AI innovation while preventing misuse, particularly by enforcing purpose limitation in downstream AI applications.
By Zihan Wang, Zhiyong Ma, Zhongkui Ma, Shuofeng Liu, Akide Liu, Derui Wang, Minhui Xue, Guangdong Bai
arXiv:2501. 15509v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Model fingerprinting has emerged as a crucial mechanism for safeguarding the intellectual property of open-source models, offering a non-intrusive approach that requires no modifications to the protected model.
By Shuo Shao, Haozhe Zhu, Yiming Li, Hongwei Yao, Tianwei Zhang, Zhan Qin
arXiv:2410. 01574v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) capabilities is accompanied by a concerning rise in its misuse.
By Sina Mavali, Jonas Ricker, David Pape, Asja Fischer, Lea Sch\"onherr
arXiv:2608.31142v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The 2025--2026 AI market has seen a wave of stealth releases: frontier models launched anonymously on developer platforms under codenames. For their...
By Yisen Xi
arXiv:2607. 26641v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Identity document (ID) authentication relies on the structural integrity of complex, high-frequency security patterns.
By Mu\~noz-Haro Javier, Teruel Andres, Tolosana Ruben, DeAlcala Daniel, Vera-Rodriguez Ruben, Morales Aythami, Fierrez Julian
The paper investigates whether pixels alone can determine an image’s origin—human, AI class, or specific generator—under adversarial edits. It establishes a minimax limit: the best possible robust acceptance gap equals the minimum total‑variation distance between the target distribution and attacked source distributions, independent of verifier design. The study also shows that practical public verifiers can fail before reaching this theoretical ceiling, highlighting the need to evaluate both statistical limits and deployed verifier behavior separately.
By Kai Yao
The paper introduces BIND, a framework that binds a human’s biometric data to an AI agent’s identity and task-specific authority, enabling secure, real‑time delegation of control. By generating a token that an AI agent presents to an Identity Auditor, the system performs biometric authentication and recovers the agent’s ID and scope, providing non‑repudiable proof of human oversight. A practical implementation using face features and a fuzzy commitment scheme with turbo error‑correcting codes achieves a 96% true match rate at zero false match rate and supports 1024‑bit agent tokens.
By Joseph Geo Benjamin, Anil K Jain, Karthik Nandakumar
arXiv:2608. 08195v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are high-value assets that can be derived through redeployment, fine-tuning, quantization, or further alignment.
By Yutong Wu, Xiaofan Bai, Shixin Li, Pingyi Hu, Ziqi Zhou, Zilong Wang, Xiaojing Ma, Songfeng Lu, Yuhong Li, Jin Xuan, Yi Wang, Dongmei Zhang, Bin Benjamin Zhu
arXiv:2604. 12431v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Organisations increasingly outsource privacy-sensitive data transformations to cloud providers, yet no practical mechanism lets the data owner verify that the contracted algorithm was faithfully executed.
By Miit Daga, Swarna Priya Ramu