arXiv:2609.24357v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-domain Named Entity Recognition (CD-NER) aims to transfer the rich knowledge in the source domain to the target domain. Recent studies adopting d...
arXiv:2609.24372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) based on large language models (LLMs) has shown promising potential in alleviating performance bottlenecks caused by the limi...
arXiv:2502. 11491v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing.
arXiv:2510. 09711v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC), offering strong reasoning and generalization capabilities beyond traditional embedding-based approaches.
arXiv:2606. 06109v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Entity alignment (EA) aims to identify equivalent entities across heterogeneous knowledge graphs (KGs) and is a key component of knowledge fusion and cross-KG reasoning.
arXiv:2608. 16161v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: General-purpose text embedding models are designed to capture semantic similarity but are not optimised for distinguishing entity records that represent the same real-world business or person.
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance. Existing evaluation practices rely heavily on task-specific metrics or small-scale manual verification, offering limited insight into the structural and semantic fidelity of extracted graphs.
arXiv:2607. 10212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance.
The paper introduces AVA, a framework that tests whether general NLP embeddings can differentiate logic-sensitive relational semantics in ontologies and knowledge graphs. AVA uses 171,007 contrastive triplets from 163 ontologies, each containing an ontology statement, a paraphrase, and a hard negative with contradictory meaning. Evaluation of over 25 embedding models shows significant limitations, with the best model achieving only 0.739 triplet accuracy and 0.135 for hard negatives; fine‑tuning helps but does not transfer well to downstream Semantic Web tasks.
arXiv:2608. 08636v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific named entity recognition (SciNER) plays a crucial role in information extraction and knowledge discovery from scientific texts.
arXiv:2607. 03154v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-domain knowledge graph completion (MKGC) aims to improve missing triple prediction in a target KG by transferring knowledge from other support KGs.
arXiv:2607. 28680v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Entity linking in tables matches short and ambiguous cell mentions to their corresponding knowledge-base entities.