arXiv AI

Fair Division with Strictly Increasing Valuations: A Tight Threshold for Two-Agent EF1 and PO

arXiv:2607. 23367v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study whether strictly positive marginal values restore the compatibility of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimality (PO) for indivisible goods.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

Simultaneous Envy and Equitability Guarantees

The paper investigates the compatibility of envy-freeness and equitability in fair division, focusing on both indivisible goods and chores. It shows that the relaxed notions EF1+EQ1 may not exist even for normalized additive valuations, but provides an algorithm that finds an EF1+EQ1 allocation for up to seven agents with binary goods. For chores, the authors prove that a stronger EFX+EQX guarantee always exists, regardless of normalization, and they also explore cross-notion ex‑ante and ex‑post fairness guarantees.

By Hadi Hosseini, Shraddha Pathak, Lirong Xia, Chengkai Zhang
arXiv AI
Jul 21

Content Creation with Spillovers: An Incentive Design Approach

arXiv:2603. 14372v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The rise of AI amplifies the economic phenomenon of \emph{positive spillovers}: when creators contribute content that can be reused and adapted by LLMs, one creator's effort may improve the content quality of others through recombination.

By Sagi Ohayon, Boaz Taitler, Omer Ben-Porat
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Keep Everyone Happy: Online Fair Division of Numerous Items with Few Copies

The paper introduces a new online fair division framework where a learner must allocate indivisible items to agents in real time, balancing fairness and efficiency. Traditional methods rely on many copies of each item to estimate utilities, but this is unrealistic for platforms with many users and few interactions. By treating utility as an unknown function of item-agent features and framing the problem as a contextual bandit, the authors propose algorithms that achieve sublinear regret and demonstrate their effectiveness experimentally.

By Arun Verma, Indrajit Saha, Makoto Yokoo, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
arXiv AI
6d ago

Dynamic Welfare-Maximizing Pooled Testing

The paper studies a budget‑constrained welfare problem for pooled testing, where agents have heterogeneous utilities and independent probabilities of being healthy. It proves that an optimal dynamic testing policy can achieve at most twice the welfare of the best static overlapping allocation, regardless of population, budget, or pool‑size limit. The authors also identify cases where adaptivity offers no benefit, show that re‑pooling after positive tests is necessary for strict gains, and provide approximation guarantees for greedy algorithms.

By Edwin Lock, Nicholas Lopez, Francisco Marmolejo-Coss\'io, Jose Roberto Tello Ayala, David C. Parkes