arXiv Computation and Language

Large Language Models for Machine Translation Quality Annotation: Humans and Models Are Both Challenged

Large Language Models (LLMs) are being tested as a cost‑effective alternative to human judgment for evaluating machine translation (MT). This study compares LLM agreement with human annotators on two MT quality schemes—Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) and Error Span Annotation (ESA)—across 70 language pairs and public WMT23/25 data. Results show that while LLMs sometimes match or exceed human agreement, performance varies widely by scheme, language, and domain, and remains unreliable in many settings. The work also identifies specific challenges for both humans (e.g., fine‑grained MQM, low‑resource languages) and LLMs (e.g., minor errors, wrong language variants, span annotation).

arXiv AI
Sep 2

Is Human Annotation Necessary? Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection in Machine Translation

The paper introduces Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection (ESD) in machine translation, a self‑evolution framework that replaces human annotations with pseudo‑labels generated by a large language model. By iteratively applying Minimum Bayes Risk decoding, the method produces high‑quality error spans without costly human effort. Experiments on WMT Metrics Shared Task datasets show that models trained solely on these pseudo‑labels outperform both unadapted baselines and supervised models trained on human data at system and span levels, while keeping sentence‑level performance competitive.

By Boxuan Lyu, Haiyue Song, Zhi Qu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

Last Translation Benchmark

The paper introduces the Last Translation Benchmark (LTB), a live dataset of human-authored and peer‑reviewed examples—including texts, images, audio, and videos—that are designed to break current state‑of‑the‑art machine translation models. Each example is accompanied by handcrafted verification rules that specify concrete failure cases, providing a reliable and actionable evaluation method. The benchmark aims to overcome the limitations of existing automatic metrics and gold human evaluations, which often lack reproducibility, objectivity, and scalability.

By Vil\'em Zouhar, Niyati Bafna, Mukund Choudhary, Maike Z\"ufle, Sara Rajaee, Pinzhen Chen, Jannis Vamvas, Sara Papi, Ona de Gibert, Bhavitvya Malik, Eliya Habba, Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis, Patr\'icia Schmidtov\'a, Michelle Wastl, Sheriff Issaka, Leshem Choshen, Stella Biderman, Antonis Anastasopoulos, Jan Niehues, Rico Sennrich, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ond\v{r}ej Bojar, Kenton Murray, J\"org Tiedemann, Alham Fikri Aji, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, Alexandra Birch, Sowmya Vajjala, Chalamalasetti Kranti, Cristina Espa\~na-Bonet, Nobin Sarwar, David Kacz\'er, Shunta Asano, Malik Marmonier, Daban Q. Jaff, Vaisakhi Mishra, Hend Al- Khalifa, Gabriele Sarti, Sourajit Saha, Nils Rehlinger, Juan Daniel Cuervo Villa, Jonathan Tonglet, Saugata Purkayastha, Dominik Mach\'a\v{c}ek, Jagannathan Ramanujam, Heejin Do, Zuzana Nadova, Fred Philippy, Fabian Retkowski, Maria Lymperaiou, Silvia Casola, Hanna Yukhymenko, Shubhashis Roy Dipta, Sangwon Ryu, Andr\'es Jerez, Ron Keinan, Shuaib Shuaib Yusuf, Avantica Vempati, Maria Carmen Staiano, Sukannya Purkayastha, Adrian Cosma, Vitalii Babenko, Erivan Inan, Aviral Nigam, Wafa Aissa, Fatima Haouari, Venkata Prasanth Kumar Gummadi, Mehdi Jafarzadeh, Valentin Scourneau, Lukas Edman, Kaiser Sun, Shaomu Tan, Mohammad Sadegh Gholizadeh, Johannes-Rudolf David, Dipankar Srirag, Javier Garc\'ia Gilabert, Ruta Binkyte, Manar Ali, Ana-Maria Bucur, Sabry E. Farrag, Youssef Saber, Yihong Liu, Jean Maillard, Cojocaru Nicoleta, Xiaochuang Yuan, Sina Ahmadi, Philipp Mondorf, Kaustubh Dhole, Roman Wixinger, Shenbin Qian, Manuel Tuor, Sergey Troshin, Jonathan Yahav, Fida Mohammad Thoker, Amir Arsalan Rezapour, Lance Calvin Lim Gamboa, Manon Reusens, K\"atriin Kukk, Koel Dutta Chowdhury, Giuseppe Gallipoli, Christian Hoang, Shaswati Saha, Seth Aycock, Jan Koco\'n, Bo Chen, Linh Vu, Vatsal Venkatkrishna, Arafat Ahsan, Luan Thanh Nguyen, Hassan Soliman, Daryna Dementieva, Theresia Veronika Rampisela, Ngoc Quynh Tram Do, Marius Huber, Kazuki Egashira, Azmine Toushik Wasi, Vladislav Poritski, Mike Zhang, Deep Shah, Paul Gavrikov, Luis Frentzen Salim, David Africa, R. Damanhuri, Bello Umar Bello, Anumit Garg, Gengyu Rao, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Kamile Dementaviciute, Andrianos Michail, L D M S Sai Teja, Dawei Zhu, Yi Fan, Wei Liu, Farhan Farsi, Elias Herranen, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Karen Sanchez, Farzad Shami, Ashok Urlana, Zimu Wang, Tomasz Limisiewicz, Priyaranjan Pattnayak, Marii Ojastu, Hongbin Na, Emilian Radoi, Chenyi Zhao, Carlos Hinojosa, Andrea Gregor de Varda, Zaid Alyafeai, Reem Alzahrani, Nehal Kathrotia, Alex Fl\"uckiger, Ulysses Sekai Tully Carr, Jimson Paulo Layacan, Guy Kaplan, Ritwik Tiwari, Rishit Dagli, Oksana Volchek, Isaac R Caswell, Bowen Yi, Blanka K\"ov\'er, Amir Hossein Yari, Aicha Chorana, Zhengxiang Wang, Selja Ker\"anen, Samuel Simko, Joy Olusanya, Jenny Chim, Enzo Doyen, Vivek Harsha Lakkamaneni, Sophia Conrad, Pouya Sadeghi, Panayiotis Panayiotou, Luis Lara, Jannatul Nayem, Eran Yahav, Debanshu Das, Antonia Karamolegkou, Anmol Goel, Aishik Mandal, Tommaso Cerruti, Raoyuan Zhao, Mykola Haltiuk, Thura Aung, Naser Almousa, Amir Hossein Kargaran, Rachel Bawden, Qiaoyuan Zheng, Mateusz Lango, Beni Egressy, Fidel Rodr\'iguez Vel\'asquez, Natchapon Jongwiriyanurak, Minh Ngoc Do, Marco Gaido, Lena Libon, Dzmitry Kuzmin, Badal Nyalang, Antoine Taroni, Andrei Niculae, Abdulaziz Nura Kani, Rushikesh Zawar, Marek \v{S}uppa, Beatrice Savoldi, Andreas Simons, Rayyan Merchant, Ilai Yaron Levy, Francesco Pinto, Ziyi Yang, Yolanda Xavier, Samuel Frontull, Muhammad Ravi Shulthan Habibi, Kenneth Enevoldsen, Harris Abdul Majid, Francesca Padovani, Tim Graf, Tatiana Bielakova, Sharifa Djurabaeva, Shaoxiong Ji, Raia Abu Ahmad, Pavel Stepachev, Jirui Qi, Ayush Sunil Munot, Alireza Pakniat, Ayla Rigouts Terryn, Yuxing Lu, Yurii Paniv, Xiyan Fu, Tosin Adewumi, Sunisth Kumar, St\'ephane J. P. S. Thunus, Shree Harsha Bokkahalli Satish, Shayan Bali, Prakhar Gupta, Papa Abdou Karim Karou Diallo, Matija Akrap, Marko Culjak, Krist\'yna Onderkov\'a, Joseph Attieh, Esrael Teferi Tensay, Elisabeth Fittschen, Beno\^it Sagot, Jingwei Ni, Yu Fan
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 16

EviSI: An Evidence-Based Evaluation Agent for Simultaneous Interpreting

EviSI is an evidence‑based evaluation agent for low‑latency simultaneous speech‑to‑speech translation. It combines Multidimensional Quality Metrics with interpreter‑developed criteria, using shared source evidence to assess four dimensions—Anchor, Event, Logic, and Fluency—while deduplicating verified errors before scoring. On English‑to‑Chinese and Chinese‑to‑English data, EviSI’s rankings correlate strongly with human judgments, outperforming BLEU and COMET, and its multilingual extension maintains these correlations across five language directions.

By Ben Yan, Zongyao Li, Xiaoyu Chen, Daimeng Wei, Weidong Liu, Huan Zhao, Chong Li, Yaode Wang, Yuzhe Shang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

M-GATE: Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 03803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task _in_ a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Burkert, Angelika Peljak-{\L}api\'nska, David Zelen\'y
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

EviSI: An Evaluation Agent for Simultaneous Interpreting

EviSI is a large language model evaluation agent designed for simultaneous speech-to-speech translation. It adapts Multidimensional Quality Metrics to assess semantic fidelity and oral expression, using shared source evidence and deterministic scoring. In English‑to‑Chinese, EviSI achieves a mean Kendall agreement of 0.707 with human system rankings, outperforming baseline metrics, and shows positive concordance with COMET across five translation directions.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

Evaluating the Evaluator: Summarization Metrics and LLM-Judges beyond English

The paper introduces BASSE, a multilingual meta‑evaluation dataset containing 2,040 human‑rated abstractive summaries produced manually or by five LLMs with four prompts. Annotators scored each summary on coherence, consistency, fluency, relevance, and 5W1H using a 5‑point Likert scale. Benchmarking shows proprietary LLM‑judge models best align with human judgments, followed by criteria‑specific automatic metrics, while open‑source judge LLMs perform poorly.

By Jeremy Barnes, Naiara Perez, Alba Bonet-Jover, Bego\~na Altuna