arXiv:2608.30223v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We propose a new design of fair classifiers for multi-class classification problems in the presence of vector-valued sensitive attributes. In that sc...
By Darinka Dentcheva, Xiangyu Tian
arXiv:2606. 00656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring fair and equitable treatment across diverse groups, particularly in multi-class classification tasks, poses a significant challenge due to the persistent biases inherent in machine learning models.
By Li Zhang, Yuyuan Li, XiaoHua Feng, Jiaming Zhang, Fengyuan Yu, Chaochao Chen
arXiv:2603. 21393v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The widespread use of AI and ML models in sensitive areas raises significant concerns about fairness.
By Maryam Boubekraoui, Giordano d'Aloisio, Antinisca Di Marco
arXiv:2607. 18119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fair clustering aims to make cluster assignments independent of sensitive attributes, but this goal becomes challenging when multiple sensitive attributes jointly define many subgroups.
By Kyungseon Lee, Hankyo Jeong, Kunwoong Kim, Kwanho Lee, Yongdai Kim
arXiv:2402. 01811v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Credit scoring has been catalogued by the European Commission and the Executive Office of the US President as a high-risk classification task, in light of the potential harms of making loan approval decisions based on models that would be biased against certain groups.
By Pablo Casas, Huan Yu, Christophe Mues
arXiv:2602.08589v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: PageRank (PR) is a fundamental algorithm in graph machine learning tasks. Owing to the increasing importance of algorithmic fairness, we consider t...
By Emmanouil Kariotakis, Aritra Konar
arXiv:2606. 20461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning models have been shown to exhibit discriminatory outcomes or degraded performance for individuals at the intersection of multiple sensitive attributes, such as race and gender.
By Bruno Scarone, Alfredo Viola, Ren\'ee J. Miller
arXiv:2604. 16610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning models often inherit biases from historical data, raising critical concerns about fairness and accountability.
By Yixiao Lin, James Booth
arXiv:2304. 13917v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In recent years, there has been a surge in effort to formalize notions of fairness in machine learning.
By Haris Aziz, Barton E. Lee, Sean Morota Chu, Jeremy Vollen
FairLRF proposes a fairness-oriented low rank factorization framework that uses singular value decomposition (SVD) to improve deep learning model fairness. By selectively removing bias-inducing elements from the unitary matrices obtained via SVD, the method reduces group disparities while preserving accuracy. Experiments demonstrate that FairLRF outperforms existing low rank factorization and state-of-the-art fairness techniques, and an ablation study explores the impact of key hyper-parameters.
By Yuanbo Guo, Jun Xia, Yiyu Shi
arXiv:2607. 29441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many real-world systems rely on predictive models to inform decisions, and fairness concerns arise in both the prediction and decision stages.
By Yu Wang (Xinying), Violet (Xinying), Chen
The paper argues that traditional probabilistic fairness metrics can miss significant disparities in the actual consequences of decisions. By introducing a utility-based framework, the authors show that a process can satisfy ε-fairness yet still be maximally unfair when utilities are considered. They apply this framework to college admissions and credit‑risk assessment, demonstrating that equalizing probabilities alone may mask unequal utility outcomes across groups.
By Tolulope Fadina, Thorsten Schmidt