arXiv AI

ARIA: Runtime Inspection and Amendment for Multi-Agent Systems

ARIA is a framework that learns to repair ongoing multi‑agent system executions by turning verified repairs into training data. It builds a large dataset of 3,953 repair pairs from over 24,000 trajectories across multiple frameworks and benchmarks, then trains a compact model to detect when and how to intervene during runtime. The resulting model shows strong repair performance, generalizing to unseen frameworks and host models.

arXiv AI
Oct 1

Agent Error Dataset: Scaling 50,000 Error--Diagnosis Pairs for Failure Analysis and Error-Aware Post-Training

The Agent Error Dataset (AED) presents 50,228 error–diagnosis pairs collected from 9,961 source tasks across 33 environments, 19 harness families, and 23 policy models in text‑based agent systems. A five‑stage Agentic Error‑to‑Training (AET) pipeline generates diagnoses and proposed corrections, verifies them against recorded evidence, and creates separate training views for diagnosis and actor recovery. Experiments show that first‑proposal corrections improve verifier pass rates from 18.4% to 51.1%, and fine‑tuning with full‑diagnosis data raises Qwen3‑8B’s exact‑step agreement from 47.2% to 63.6% on a holdout set.

By Kunlun Zhu, Xuyan Ye, Yibo Li, Cheng Qian, Beibin Li, Heng Ji
arXiv AI
Oct 19

AOI: Turning Failed Trajectories into Training Signals for Autonomous Cloud Diagnosis

The paper introduces AOI (Autonomous Operations Intelligence), a multi‑agent framework that treats automated site reliability tasks as a structured trajectory learning problem under security constraints. It combines a trainable diagnostic system using Group Relative Policy Optimization, a read‑write separated execution architecture, and a Failure Trajectory Closed‑Loop Evolver that turns unsuccessful runs into corrective supervision. On the AIOpsLab benchmark, AOI achieves significant performance gains, including a 66.3% best@5 success rate and improved average metrics on unseen fault types.

By Pei Yang, Wanyi Chen, Asuka Yuxi Zheng, Xueqian Li, Xiang Li, Haoqin Tu, Jie Xiao, Yifan Pang, Dongdong Zhang, Fuqiang Li, Alfred Long, Lynn Ai, Eric Yang, Bill Shi, Yifan Chen, Shuhan Sun
arXiv AI
Aug 11

FailForge: Distilling Procedural Competence from Persistent Failures into Code Agents

arXiv:2608. 08570v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rejection sampling fine-tuning (RFT) is widely used to train code agents by generating trajectories on verifiable software engineering tasks, retaining those that pass the tests, and fine-tuning on the successful rollouts.

By Dongyi Lv, Fushun E, Aichen Cai, Liang Huang, Ya Zhang, Qiuyu Ding, Canhui Wu, Zhi Wang, Yuesong Zhang, Jiaqi Wang, Nan Duan
arXiv AI
Aug 7

SearchAuditor: Auditing and Attributing Failures in Long-Horizon Search Agents

arXiv:2608. 05212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep search agents tackle challenging questions through long-horizon web interactions, a process that is both complex and fragile: small reasoning errors may propagate through long, noisy trajectories into fluent but incorrect answers.

By Zhixiang Liang, Yifei Liu, Yidan Huang, Haozhe Zhao, Beichen Huang, Jiaqi Wang, Nan Duan, Qiong Cao
arXiv AI
Jul 14

AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?

arXiv:2607. 10059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous tasks, yet existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.

By Xun Liu, Yi Evie Zhang, Vira Kasprova, Parisa Rabbani, Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Tianyu Zhang, Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Varun Chandrasekaran