The paper introduces 3DVerifierBench, a benchmark covering ten tasks that evaluates 3D content generation for correctness, rejection explanations, and responsiveness to specification changes. It highlights a significant performance gap between humans and current models, and presents a scalable pipeline that generates over 14,000 training examples with contradiction explanations. The study also demonstrates how verification can improve 3D generation via candidate selection and recursive refinement, raising factual success rates dramatically.
arXiv:2511.14086v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite recent progress in 3D-LLMs, they remain limited in accurately grounding language to visual and spatial elements in 3D environments. T...
arXiv:2606. 01057v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Procedural 3D modeling through code is emerging as a versatile paradigm, offering deterministic, engine-ready, and precisely editable assets that neural 3D generators inherently lack.
arXiv:2610.10066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in both visual understanding and code generation. However, existing...
arXiv:2606.11152v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models can write code to produce complex programs as well as use programs to do 3D modeling, which opens up a new avenue...
The paper introduces 3DCodeVerse, a research ecosystem that allows coding agents to generate editable and verifiable 3D content at scale. It comprises a large curated dataset of 3D executable code (3DCodeVerse‑2M), a multi‑agent harness that automatically evaluates and refines generated programs using execution checks and spatial measurements, and empirical studies that establish baselines and practical guidance for 3D coding. Experiments show that fine‑tuning on the dataset improves open‑source models’ 3D coding abilities, and the harness outperforms Claude Design in pairwise human evaluations when used with Claude Opus 5.5.
The paper introduces T23D-CompBench, a new benchmark for fine‑grained text‑to‑3D quality assessment that includes 3,600 textured meshes generated from ten state‑of‑the‑art models and 129,600 human ratings. It also proposes Rank2Score, a two‑stage rank‑learning metric that first trains with supervised contrastive regression and curriculum learning, then refines predictions using mean opinion scores to better align with human judgments. Experiments show Rank2Score outperforms existing metrics and can be used as a reward function for generative model optimization.
EDCT-Bench is a benchmark that evaluates the faithfulness of Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) by using Explanation‑Driven Counterfactual Testing (EDCT). EDCT extracts visual concepts from a model’s natural language explanation, applies minimal verified edits to those concepts, and checks whether the model’s answer and explanation remain consistent with the edited image. The benchmark covers three domains—knowledge‑intensive VQA, safety‑critical driving, and 3D spatial reasoning—and reveals significant faithfulness gaps in current VLMs, while also showing that EDCT‑generated counterfactuals can improve training.
The paper introduces 3D-Prog, a framework that adapts powerful 2D vision‑language models (VLMs) for reliable 3D understanding, manipulation, and generation. It does so by employing Canonical Coordinate Framing (CCF) to anchor inputs and outputs in a shared Euclidean coordinate system, resolving axis ambiguity, metric scale, and reference issues, and Task‑Adaptive Feedback (TAF) to close the reasoning loop with dynamic, task‑specific feedback. Together, CCF and TAF enable 2D VLMs to perform open‑vocabulary 3D tasks without retraining, yielding consistent, interpretable, and high‑quality results across diverse 3D scenarios.
arXiv:2609.16233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models excel at 2D image understanding but remain limited in 3D spatial reasoning. Progress is hindered by limitations in current ben...
arXiv:2607. 22864v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel at visual interpretation but fail on spatial reasoning tasks that humans solve reliably.
arXiv:2604.09531v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle with visual perception tasks such as spatial understanding and viewpoint recognition, largely be...
arXiv:2609.38177v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning about the 3D world from multi-view images remains a fundamental challenge for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). While modern MLLMs...