arXiv:2607. 09204v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pretrained language models often exhibit structured weight spectra, suggesting that training may repeatedly produce similar layerwise and component-wise organization.
arXiv:2607. 03377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapidly growing repository of publicly available large language models (LLMs) presents significant challenges for systematic management and quantification at scale, such as model lineage tracing, licensing, and evaluation.
arXiv:2602. 12429v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Foundation models have achieved remarkable success, yet their growing parameter counts pose significant computational and memory challenges.
arXiv:2608. 10850v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study continual pre-training (CPT) as a mechanism for adapting general-purpose large language models to specialized domains: mathematics, instruction, code, and natural text.
The paper investigates how six naturalistic and synthetic input perturbations affect decoder‑only language models at three levels: output behavior, hidden‑state geometry, and attention‑head function. Using GPT‑2 and Qwen2.5 checkpoints, the authors analyze layerwise geometry with centered kernel alignment and intrinsic dimension, and examine attention‑head responses in GPT‑2. They find that perturbation types produce distinct metric profiles that are not fully captured by output measures and vary across checkpoints, highlighting the need for multi‑level evaluation of robustness.
arXiv:2608. 03494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vocabulary extension is an efficient way to adapt pretrained large language models (LLMs) to new languages, but the initialization of newly added token embeddings can strongly affect continued pre-training (CPT) efficiency.
arXiv:2606. 16456v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models enable efficient scaling, but training them from scratch remains prohibitively expensive.
The paper investigates how six naturalistic and synthetic input perturbations affect decoder‑only language models at three levels: output behavior, hidden‑state geometry, and attention‑head function. Using GPT‑2 and Qwen2.5 checkpoints, the authors analyze layerwise geometry with centered kernel alignment and intrinsic dimension, and examine attention‑head responses in GPT‑2. They find that perturbation types produce distinct metric profiles that are not fully captured by output measures and vary across checkpoints, highlighting the need for multi‑level evaluation of robustness.
Measuring training data influence consistently across language model pretraining is challenging. It is difficult to select downstream tasks or validation sets representative of a model's general capabilities, and reliance on task performance at intermediate checkpoints complicates comparisons across training.
arXiv:2606. 06888v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classical scaling laws for language model pretraining balance model size against training dataset size under a fixed compute budget, assuming abundant data and a single pass over the corpus.
arXiv:2607. 24507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing methods mainly adapt pretrained autoregressive (AR) language models to masked diffusion, whereas we directly adapt them to uniform-noise diffusion, where every token remains editable during sampling.
The paper introduces MSign, an optimizer designed to prevent training instability in large language models by restoring the stable rank of weight matrices. It identifies two precursors to gradient explosions—rapid stable rank decline and increased Jacobian alignment—and proves that these jointly cause exponential gradient growth. Experiments on models ranging from 5 M to 3 B parameters show that MSign stops training failures while adding less than 7.0% computational overhead.
The study investigates how layer‑wise intervention responses in language models change over the course of pretraining, using single‑block identity bypass across multiple checkpoints and model‑domain combinations. It finds that while depth ordering of responses persists, their magnitudes shift, with nearby checkpoints showing stronger rank correspondence than distant ones and large changes occurring at positions that recur across samples and transfer across evaluation domains. Controlled experiments reveal that these longitudinal changes cannot be explained by a single downstream sensitivity and depend on perturbation strength and direction, indicating that layer sensitivity is structured but dynamic.