Large reasoning models generate chain-of-thought (CoT) before answering but struggle with safety alignment and can be misled by flawed premises. The paper introduces RECAP, a reinforcement learning approach that trains models to override flawed reasoning paths and produce safe, helpful responses without extra training cost. RECAP improves safety, jailbreak robustness, and reduces overrefusal while preserving core reasoning abilities and inference token budget.
By ShengYun Peng, Pin-Yu Chen, Eric Smith, Song Jiang, Hongyuan Zhan, Haozhu Wang, Mahesh Pasupuleti, Duen Horng Chau, Jianfeng Chi
arXiv:2606. 31748v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety training on language models often induces over-refusal: improved safety on harmful prompts at the cost of increased refusal on harmless ones.
By Taeyoun Kim, Aviral Kumar
The paper introduces "cunning questions"—non‑safety prompts that contain misleading premises or subtle inconsistencies—to train large language models (LLMs) to scrutinize underlying intent and assumptions. Experiments show that incorporating these questions improves robustness against out‑of‑distribution jailbreak attacks and enhances subsequent safety fine‑tuning, achieving a new state‑of‑the‑art reduction in mean ASR from 17.40% to 15.05% across nine backbone–benchmark combinations. The authors argue that this training fosters vigilance, enabling models to prioritize safety judgments before engaging in harmful planning.
By Youjia Wang, Lin Xu, Yang Sun, Yuxiao Lu, Chengfang Fang, Jie Shi
arXiv:2603. 26846v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) expand in capability and application scope, their trustworthiness becomes critical.
By Guoxi Zhang, Jiawei Chen, Tianzhuo Yang, Lang Qin, Juntao Dai, Yaodong Yang, Jingwei Yi
The paper introduces SaLT-DPO, a Segment‑aware Listwise Target DPO method designed to improve safety in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). It decomposes responses into reasoning and answer segments, scores each segment’s safety, and aligns length‑normalized rewards with soft target distributions over multiple candidates. The approach also incorporates joint safety coherence regularization and utility anchoring to reduce unsafe content while maintaining compliance and reasoning performance.
By JungMin Yun, Junehyoung Kwon, Hayeong Ryu, Byeonggeuk Lim, Hoejoon Kwon, YoungBin Kim
arXiv:2607. 02914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse applications, yet ensuring their simultaneous safety, helpfulness, and trustworthiness remains a persistent challenge.
By Jiyang Guan, Yong Xie, Jun Chen, Jiexi Liu, Zipeng Ye, Defeng Li, Jiayu Shen, Jialing Tao, Hui Xue
arXiv:2608. 09542v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve remarkable success on complex tasks but remain vulnerable to harmful prompts that induce unsafe outputs.
By Hongli Shen, Shaopeng Fu, Qinbo Zhang, Jian Li, Di Wang
arXiv:2608. 03745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning offers a promising window into model monitoring.
By Dominik Meier, Luca Joshua Francis, Marco Bernhard Kaiser, Terry Ruas, Jan Philip Wahle, Bela Gipp
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) use explicit chain‑of‑thought reasoning and large context windows to perform complex tasks, but these features create new attack surfaces. The paper introduces SRCF, an attack that steers LRMs by prepending counter‑aligned few‑shot conversations with explicit CoT traces, causing unsafe outputs on harmful queries and unwarranted refusals on benign ones, without needing model internals. To counter this, the authors propose ARCF, a post‑training defense that exposes models to counter‑aligned conversational contexts while enforcing aligned targets, improving safety and helpfulness without harming utility.
By Xiangyu Zhou, Saleh Zare Zade, Dongxiao Zhu
TRACE is a new benchmark that evaluates the safety of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) across the entire inference pipeline, including prompts, reasoning traces, and final responses. It provides prompts in two languages covering nine risk categories and ten attack strategies, and for each prompt four LRMs generate traces and responses that are annotated for safety with supporting evidence extracted from the source text. Evaluation of 18 guardrail models on TRACE shows that detecting unsafe content in reasoning traces is much harder than in prompts or final responses, and that current models struggle to extract the necessary evidence.
By Zhenyu Wu, Siyuan Chen, Changchun Yang, Jiaqi Dong, Min Zhou, Ali Almadan, Talal Hammad, Faisal Wahbo, Aminullah Tora, Mona Alshahrani, Xin Gao
arXiv:2602. 12124v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While most AI alignment research focuses on preventing models from generating explicitly harmful content, a more subtle risk arises from capability-seeking RL training in vulnerable environments.
By Yujun Zhou, Yue Huang, Han Bao, Kehan Guo, Zhenwen Liang, Pin-Yu Chen, Tian Gao, Werner Geyer, Nuno Moniz, Nitesh V Chawla, Xiangliang Zhang
arXiv:2602. 09305v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate transformative potential, yet their reasoning remains inconsistent and unreliable.
By Pei-Chi Pan, Yingbin Liang, Sen Lin