The paper introduces Auto-Comp, a fully automated, concept-driven pipeline that generates photorealistic compositional benchmarks for vision‑language models. Auto‑Comp creates paired Minimal and Contextual samples for each concept, enabling isolation of core binding abilities from visio‑linguistic complexity. Evaluations across 25 models reveal consistent failures in attribute and relational binding, with context helping relational tasks but hindering attribute tasks due to visual clutter.
By Cristian Sbrolli, Toshihiko Yamasaki, Matteo Matteucci
MatToolBench is a new benchmark that evaluates multimodal GUI agents on professional materials science software. It contains 204 tasks across 10 tools in three modalities—GUI operation, OriginPro scripting, and code-based database queries—executed inside a Windows 11 VM. The benchmark offers fine-grained, expert-decomposed scoring and a high-performing multimodal judge for aesthetic assessment, revealing that strong general benchmark performance does not transfer to scientific workflows.
By Mei Wu, Rui Xie, Runyu Zhang, Yuqiang Li, Tianfan Fu, Bo Chen, Kai Yu, Xin Chen, Lu Chen
Timeline-Bench is a benchmark comprising 56 real video‑editing tasks that require AI agents to transform raw production material into finished videos. Each task includes a brief, source assets, a container, and a set of tests that assess format, content, brief compliance, and quality based on 2,582 blind judgments by 43 video editors. In evaluations, the best agent resolved only 15 of the 56 tasks, and most failures were due to quality tests rather than technical errors.
arXiv:2606. 28551v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Building performant Vision-Language Models (VLMs) requires carefully curating large-scale training datasets, yet the community lacks systematic benchmarks for evaluating such curation strategies.
By Matteo Farina, Vishaal Udandarao, Thao Nguyen, Selim Kuzucu, Maximilian B\"other, Andreas Hochlehnert, Adhiraj Ghosh, Marianna Nezhurina, Karsten Roth, Joschka Struber, Yuhui Zhang, Sebastian Dziadzio, Elaine Sui, Soumya Jahagirdar, Dhruba Ghosh, Hasan Hammoud, Thomas De Min, Simone Caldarella, Jehanzeb Mirza, Sedrick Keh, Mehdi Cherti, Hilde Kuehne, Bernt Schiele, Serena Yeung-Levy, Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Federico Tombari, Ana Klimovic, Elisa Ricci, Matthias Bethge, Sewoong Oh, Ameya Prabhu, Alessio Tonioni, Jenia Jitsev, Massimiliano Mancini, Ludwig Schmidt, Nikhil Parthasarathy
arXiv:2605. 10873v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recovering editable CAD programs from images or 3D observations is central to AI-assisted design, but progress is difficult to measure because existing evaluations are fragmented across datasets, modalities, and metrics.
By Anna C. Doris, Jacob Thomas Sony, Ghadi Nehme, Era Syla, Amin Heyrani Nobari, Faez Ahmed
arXiv:2606. 00188v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While current multimodal models are proficient at open-ended visual editing, executing precise single-answer edits remains an important obstacle.
By Kai Xu, Ellis Brown, Shrikar Madhu, Rob Fergus, He He, Saining Xie
arXiv:2607. 01813v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluation benchmarks are essential for assessing vision-language models (VLMs), but most multimodal benchmarks are static, making them vulnerable to temporal staleness, data contamination, and costly maintenance.
By Yuanzhi Liu, Shousheng Zhao, Bo Zhou, Kongming Liang, Zhanyu Ma
arXiv:2609.38010v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Modern computer vision models achieve high accuracy when trained on large-scale annotated datasets. In critical domains such as construction safety m...
By Mohamed Benkedadra, Aissa Saoudi, Maxime Gloesener, Sidi Ahmed Mahmoudi, Matei Mancas
ReFigBench is a benchmark that evaluates how well multimodal coding agents can transform scientific overview figures into editable PowerPoint slides, preserving text, layout, and document structure. The study uses 1,000 real figures from arXiv, testing agents from four model families across two workflows—direct code generation and a specialized PPTX workflow—within ten different harness configurations. Evaluation combines deterministic artifact checks, automated scoring by judges, and blinded human comparisons, revealing that workflow and harness choices significantly affect reconstruction quality and that even the best agents fall short of the ideal rubric.
By Liyang Fan, Chi Wei, Yitai Li, Xinping Bi, Guhong Chen, Chenghao Sun, Haoxiang Yang, Qingwen Li, Kai Yan, Hong Li, Bo Li
Modern black-box Image-to-Video (I2V) models offer powerful capabilities in automated content creation, yet their lack of fine-grained control and reliability presents significant challenges in professional workflows. Their inherent stochasticity causes minor variations in textual prompts or hyperparameters to yield drastically different outputs often necessitating inefficient, brute-force trial-and-error processes.
arXiv:2602.14633v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We introduce VIGIL (Visual Inconsistency & Generative In-context Lucidity), a benchmark dataset and framework that provides a fine-grained categori...
By Joanna Wojciechowicz, Maria {\L}ubniewska, Jakub Antczak, Justyna Baczy\'nska, Wojciech Gromski, Wojciech Koz{\l}owski, Maciej Zieba
SenseNova-U1.5 is an 8B‑MoT native unified multimodal model that can understand, reason about, and generate visual content without using an encoder or VAE. It improves visual fidelity and text rendering through spatially coherent patch reconstruction, large‑scale training on curated generation and editing data, and native resolutions up to 4K. Post‑training, specialized experts for visual aesthetics, bilingual text rendering, infographic generation, and image editing are optimized and distilled into a multi‑expert framework, yielding advances in image fidelity, complex composition, multi‑reference editing, and instruction following.
By Haiwen Diao, Jiahao Wang, Chenjing Ding, Hanming Deng, Jiangnan Chen, Ruixi Zhang, Ruohui Wang, Wenwen Tong, Xiangyu Fan, Yubo Wang, Yue Zhu, Yuwei Niu, Zhengqi Bai, Zhiqian Lin, Zhitao Yang, Zhongang Cai, Bo Yang, Chen Feng, Chengguang Lv, Guangjia Liu, Guanlin Wang, Hanyu Zhang, Haojia Yu, Hongcan Xiao, Hongli Wang, Huan Wu, Huaping Zhong, Jian Fang, Jianan Fan, Jiaqi Li, Jiefan Lu, Jing Zuo, Jingcheng Ni, Junxiang Xu, Linjun Dai, Mutian Xu, Peishen Yan, Penghao Wu, Ruijie Mao, Ruisi Wang, Shihao Bai, Shuang Yang, Shuya Yang, Shuyan Zheng, Silei Wu, Siying Li, Tao Chu, Tianbo Zhong, Tongxi Zhou, Weichao Luo, Weichen Fan, Wenhao Jia, Wenjie Gao, Xiangli Kong, Yan Li, Yang Yong, Zimo Wen, Zixuan Qian, Wenxiu Sun, Ruihao Gong, Quan Wang, Lewei Lu, Lei Yang, Ziwei Liu, Dahua Lin