arXiv Computation and Language By Mark Oskin

Through the Looking Glass: Directly Reading and Writing Transformers

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper investigates how many transformer components influence a token prediction by measuring the absolute contribution of each unit and channel to the logit. It finds that thousands of components contribute to a single prediction, yet a small subset—often just dozens—carries the majority of the predictive mass. Across models ranging from 124 M to 7 B parameters, the proportion of the model involved in a prediction remains around one to three percent, independent of size, and the study demonstrates that specific components can be directly read and written to modify model behavior without additional training.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13

Training, Reading, and Editing Legible Transformers

arXiv:2607. 08946v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A transformer can be built from operators that are legible by construction -- bounded, named units that read as fuzzy set operations rather than dense activations -- but legibility must be pressed for during training, and the pressure has a failure mode.

By Mark Oskin
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

The Communication Map of a Transformer

The paper introduces the Communication Map, a method that charts every potential communication channel in a transformer model using only its weights. It generalizes previous coupling metrics into a single coefficient covering all 18 connection classes, revealing that 70‑89% of head pairs are non‑randomly oriented and identifying strong or avoiding couplings. The authors demonstrate the map’s utility by recovering known induction circuits and uncovering a two‑dimensional stream subspace whose removal eliminates induction capabilities across several models.

By Richard Zhe Wang
arXiv AI
6d ago

Every Component Is a Lookup: One Linear Graph for Interaction, Composition and Attribution

The paper proposes that two architectural assumptions—(1) attention and MLPs share a key‑value form <phi(S)>U, and (2) components read from an additive residual stream—are sufficient to answer three interpretability questions: component interaction, information routing, and token attribution. By treating these selections as a computational graph, the authors develop Unpack, a backward attribution method that validates interaction scores, recovered routes, and token attribution against established tests across models ranging from 160M to 6.9B parameters. The study also shows that contribution and causal effect can differ, with a recognizable signature in how components change when a task is removed.

By Po-Kai Chen, Aske Plaat, Niki van Stein