arXiv Machine Learning

Multi-Objective Ranking for Live-Streaming: Balancing Fresh and Delayed Signals with Segment-Aware Targeting

arXiv:2608. 04455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: One of the most challenging problems entertainment live-streaming services face in recommendation systems is that user behaviors are sparse and delayed, and interaction data exhibits bias for different user segments.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Robust Federated Learning Under Real-World Client Churn

arXiv:2607. 06979v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables training shared models on private, on-device data, but production deployments remain constrained to slow, multi-day refresh cycles due to the complexity of coordinating massive client populations.

By Dhruv Garg, Neha Lakhani, Debopam Sanyal, Myungjin Lee, Alexey Tumanov, Ada Gavrilovska
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Live Assistant: Learning Whether, When, and Whom to Assist in Real-World Live Social Streams

arXiv:2609. 27303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Livestreams are long-lasting interactive environments where audiovisual content, viewer activity, host behavior, and platform signals evolve together, creating assistance needs that emerge from the stream itself.

By Shujian Gao, Jiamei Yan, Yuchen Yang, Penghao Zhou, Qinglei Wang, Tiehan Fan, Yuan Wang, Zuxuan Wu, Yu-gang Jiang
arXiv AI
Aug 10

Shape Your Feed: An LLM-based Agentic System for Conversational Recommendation

arXiv:2608. 06632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial recommendation systems predominantly adopt a passive ranking paradigm that infers user preferences from implicit behavioral signals (e.

By Ziyun Xu, Bosen Ding, Yue Zhang, Ji Qi, Qingyuan Song, Jizhou Huang, Liwei Wang, Jefferey Santelli, Yue Weng, Qichao Que, Zhenheng Yang, Junfeng Pan, Linhong Zhu
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Safety as a Constraint: Fine-Tuning a LLM Recommender to Explain Itself

The paper presents a method for fine‑tuning a large language model (LLM) recommender to generate personalized, non‑harmful explanations for its recommendations. By training two LLM‑judge reward models and using constrained GRPO, the authors achieve a significant increase in the PASS rate for all three criteria, from 0.649 to 0.956 on their own judges and from 0.677 to 0.931 on an independent judge. The fine‑tuned model maintains its original recommendation performance, demonstrating that LLM‑based recommenders can be adapted to complex tasks without loss of effectiveness.

By Jiashu He, Emma Yanyang Kong, JJ Tan, David Fagnan
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17

Long-term User Engagement Optimization through Model-agnostic Downstream Rewards Learning

arXiv:2607. 14192v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As recommender systems mature in the past few years, their optimization objectives have evolved from a primary focusing on short-term behavioral signals to a broader emphasis on long-term user engagement and retention.

By Dingsu Wang, Filip Ryzner, Kelly He, Armando Ordorica, David Woo, Aditya Mantha, Liyao Lu, Usha Amrutha Nookala, Haoran Guo, Jiacong He, Olafur Gudmundsson, Matt Chun, Krystal Benitez, Dhruvil Deven Badani, Yijie Dylan Wang
arXiv AI
Jul 14

An LLM-powered Agentic Recommendation System for Connected TV Content Discovery

arXiv:2607. 09988v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recommendation systems, from traditional multi-stage to recent unified generative architectures, face challenges in incorporating diverse contextual signals, such as trending topics, breaking news, cultural events, and cross-surface user activities, into their ranking pipelines.

By Lei Shi, Di Wang, Harry Tran, Helsing Xu, Yuchen Lu, Dhara Ghodasara, Wilson Chaney, Xueting Liao, Jerry Yu, Huayu Ding, Mingze Gao, Shike Mei, Shuo Tang, Zhe Zhang, Jianming He, Abhishek Kumar, Haotian Wu, Hamed Firooz, Li Li
arXiv AI
Jul 21

WHALE: A Scalable Unified Model for Recommendation with Wukong-HSTU Architecture

arXiv:2607. 17017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As scalability becomes increasingly important in recommendation modeling, recent architectures have advanced the modeling of two broad sources of ranking signals along separate paths: non-sequence features, including user, item, context, and cross features; and sequence features from user behavior histories.

By Renqin Cai, Dawei Sun, Yuanjun Yao, Zhiyong Wang, Velvin Fu, Maggie Zhuang, Yu Shi, Zhongnan Fang, Xuan Cao, Jing Qian, Rui Li
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27

Incremental Recommendation via Causal Models

The paper proposes an incremental recommendation approach that uses a causal model built from existing holdback data to avoid delivering redundant recommendations. By applying a dual‑threshold targeting policy, the system only recommends content when the likelihood of a treated stream is high and the likelihood of an organic stream is low, thereby reducing recommendation impressions by 7% without hurting overall consumption. Joint training with holdback data also improves the calibration of the treated head, suggesting that causal models capture more generalisable representations than purely observational models.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Incremental Recommendation via Causal Models

The paper proposes an incremental recommendation system that uses causal modeling to avoid delivering redundant recommendations. By leveraging existing holdback data and a dual‑threshold targeting policy, the authors reduce recommendation impressions by 7% without harming overall content consumption. Joint training with holdback data also improves the calibration of the treated model, suggesting better generalisable representations than purely observational models.

By Athanasios Vlontzos, David Gustafsson, Michael O'Riordan, Ciar\'an M. Gilligan-Lee