WARP-VLA is a Vision‑Language‑Action model designed to be robust to variations in wrist‑camera viewpoints. It uses a Mixture‑of‑Experts architecture where each expert learns a view‑specific feature transformation, and a router selects the appropriate expert based on implicit view cues, eliminating the need for explicit camera extrinsic parameters. Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark show that WARP‑VLA doubles the success rate of pi‑0.5 from 39.2% to 78.3% under wrist‑view perturbations, and real‑robot tests confirm that the simulation‑learned adaptation transfers to diverse deployment settings.
By Junmyeong Lee, Dongmin Shin, Min-Gyu Park, Wooseok Jeon, Inho Chang, Hae-Gon Jeon
arXiv:2609.36518v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Robots must often continue a task after a target moves, the viewpoint shifts, or an obstacle appears, even though their earlier observations and comm...
By Yunbei Zhang, Zijian Jin, Yuanzhe Liu, Janet Wang, Xilun Zhang, Yuyou Zhang, Zhenyu Zhang, Daoan Zhang, Shuaicheng Niu, Gen Li, Jianfei Yang, Jihun Hamm, Ismini Lourentzou, Weirui Ye, Bo Liu, Peter Stone, Marco Pavone
LIBERO-VPro is a benchmark designed to assess the closed‑loop visual robustness of robotic foundation models by systematically perturbing visual inputs during task execution. It spans four dimensions—Visual Evidence Degradation, Camera Staleness, Visual Source Consistency, and Task‑Relevant Scene Variation—across 12 challenge categories, 96 settings, and 3,296 task‑condition cases. Evaluations on six models over 196,000 simulated episodes and 200 real‑world rollouts show that high nominal performance can hide significant weaknesses in visual grounding, adaptation, and sensitivity to stale or missing observations.
By Huiqiong Li, Zhiting Mei, Anirudha Majumdar, Jingjing Chen, Yu-Gang Jiang, Bin Zhu
Robotic foundation models achieve impressive performance on standard manipulation benchmarks, yet these evaluations typically assume clean, timely, and consistent visual observations throughout execut...
arXiv:2607. 05396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world robot deployment rarely maintains the training-stage camera setup, where cameras often experience repositioning or remounting depending on actual scenarios.
By Wenhao Li, Xueying Jiang, Quanhao Qian, Deli Zhao, Shijian Lu, Gongjie Zhang, Ran Xu
arXiv:2607. 11498v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models predict robot actions from visual observations and language instructions.
By Byungkun Lee, Dongyoon Hwang, Dongjin Kim, Hojoon Lee, Minho Park, Jaegul Choo
arXiv:2609.38443v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We introduce BIND, a new action representation for visuomotor robot policies that binds 3D robot actions to their corresponding 2D image features, yi...
By Cameron Smith, Arsh Tangri, Vitor Guizilini, Yue Wang, Zubair Irshad, Sergey Zakharov
arXiv:2606. 08881v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong generalization in robotic manipulation, yet existing evaluations are primarily conducted in simulation or on expensive robotic platforms, leaving their robustness on affordable real-world robots largely unexplored.
By Yi Yu, Xinchuan Qiu
arXiv:2607. 20785v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying navigation systems at scale requires a recipe that minimizes sensor assumptions, generalizes across robot embodiments, and trains efficiently.
By Arjun Majumdar, Avinash Sooriyarachchi, Benjamin Tibi, Chris Bamford, Elliot Chane-Sane, Guillaume Lample, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Ludovic Ho Fuh, Mathieu Poiree, Olivier Duchenne, Rosalie Millner, Srijan Mishra, Theo Cachet, Thomas Chabal
IndustrialVLA-Bench evaluates six released vision‑language‑action (VLA) and world‑action (WAM) robot policy models using a unified reporting schema. It measures clean capability on LIBERO, non‑language robustness on LIBERO‑Plus, instruction sensitivity on LIBERO‑Para, and observed execution cost, aggregating results across three random seeds. The benchmark also reports inference latency, peak memory, runtime mode, and evidence status for each system, enabling traceable comparisons without claiming one paradigm is universally superior.
By Yiqi Wang, Zhifeng Rao, Jiaqi Zhang, Xiaoyang Li, Zhangkai Wu, Yiqun Duan, Mingkai Zheng, Fei Wang, Shan You, Taotao Cai
Real-world robot deployment rarely maintains the training-stage camera setup, where cameras often experience repositioning or remounting depending on actual scenarios. Existing view-robust Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies tolerate such camera variations only when the camera extrinsics are explicitly provided, making them fragile and hard to use especially when view robustness is critical.
arXiv:2607. 25487v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models translate natural-language commands into robot action sequences, but leading systems on the LIBERO-Plus robustness benchmark use three- to seven-billion-parameter backbones whose memory demands can exceed embedded robotic budgets.
By Minhyeok Lee, Chiyoung Kim, Chanhoe Gu, Seongrok Kim, Sanghyuk Roy Choi, Donghwan Hwang, Donghun Ryu, Seokhyun Kim