arXiv:2607. 04513v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow matching is a powerful tool for generative modeling, but emerging applications in robotics, planning, and physics require inference-time constraints on generated outputs.
By Vince Kurtz, Alexander Davydov
arXiv:2604. 17838v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative modeling within constrained sets is essential for scientific and engineering applications involving physical, geometric, or safety requirements (e.
By Kijung Jeon, Michael Muehlebach, Molei Tao
arXiv:2601. 23231v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Flow-based generative models provide strong unconditional priors for inverse problems, but guiding their dynamics for conditional generation remains challenging.
By George Webber, Alexander Denker, Riccardo Barbano, Andrew J Reader
arXiv:2607. 02628v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While diffusion models have revolutionized image synthesis, their application to real-world inverse problems is often hampered by the need for massive datasets and the difficulty of imposing strict physical constraints.
By Kanishk Awadhiya
arXiv:2607. 00095v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative models have emerged as scalable surrogates for physical simulation, yet they offer no guarantee that their outputs respect the conservation laws, boundary conditions, and nonlinear invariants that govern the underlying physics.
By Alaina Kolli, Theodoros Xenakis, Utkarsh Utkarsh, Pengfei Cai, Rafael Gomez-Bombarelli, Alan Edelman, Christopher Vincent Rackauckas
arXiv:2607. 14424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In recent years Flow Matching has become a prominent method for generative modeling robot motion generation.
By Nutan Chen, Jianxiang Feng, Marvin Alles, Botond Cseke
arXiv:2608. 02487v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recently, rectified flow has emerged as a fundamental framework for large-scale image generation, powering state-of-the-art systems such as FLUX.
By Leda Wang, Zhehao Xu, Qiang Liu, Harrison H. Zhou
arXiv:2606. 04092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow matching models learn to transport samples from a simple prior distribution to a complex data distribution.
By Shimon Malnick, Matan Rusanovsky, Ohad Fried, Shai Avidan
arXiv:2607. 26398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion and flow-based models benefit from simple regression losses, but inference incurs significant overhead because sampling requires integration.
By Mark Goldstein, Anshuk Uppal, Raghav Singhal, Aahlad Puli, Rajesh Ranganath
Optimizing 3D shapes within the latent spaces of deep generative models is fundamental to computer assisted engineering, yet remains prone to a critical failure mode we term manifold drift: the tendency of gradient-based optimization to move latent vectors away from the manifold of valid shapes. This problem is exacerbated in state-of-the-art 3D shape generative models that operate in increasingly high-dimensional latent spaces where valid shapes occupy a vanishingly small fraction of the full space.
arXiv:2508. 09156v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a framework for fine-tuning flow-matching generative models to enforce physical constraints and solve inverse problems in scientific systems.
By Jan Tauberschmidt, Sophie Fellenz, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Andrew B. Duncan
arXiv:2605. 08328v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative models based on flow matching have emerged as a powerful paradigm for inverse problems, offering straighter trajectories and faster sampling compared to diffusion models.
By Zehua Jiang, Fenghao Zhu, Xinquan Wang, Chongwen Huang, Zhaoyang Zhang