arXiv:2607. 14642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers emerge as the core infrastructure for connecting LLMs with external tools, existing benchmarks leverage real-world MCP servers to evaluate LLM agents' tool-using capabilities.
By Huanxi Liu, Kun Hu, Jiaqi Liao, Qiang Wang, Pengfei Qian, YuanZhao Zhai, Dawei Feng, Bo Ding, Huaimin Wang
Octopus Protocol is a hardware onboarding framework that allows an AI coding agent to automatically discover, identify, and integrate hardware devices into an AI system. Using a single bootstrap command, the agent runs a five-stage pipeline to enumerate visible hardware, infer device capabilities, generate typed Model Context Protocol tools, produce the necessary code, and activate a live endpoint. The system maintains a persistent daemon that repairs deployment failures, enabling consistent, platform‑agnostic interfaces across diverse hosts without manual integration code.
By Quilee Simeon, Justin M. Wei, Yile Fan
arXiv:2607. 11138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid expansion of capabilities in Large Language Model (LLM) agents has exposed a critical architectural bottleneck: when agents are given access to a flat, monolithic registry of tools, the model must evaluate hundreds or thousands of options simultaneously.
By Prashant Devadiga, Abhishek, Adithya Mishra, Alok Singh, Amisha Sinha, Asit Desai, Gaurang Dahad, Harshit Bhushan, Mandati Pramod Reddy, Prakhar Gupta, Rupesh Patil, Siddhi Behere
arXiv:2605. 10907v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The dominant paradigm for AI agents is an "on-the-fly" loop in which agents synthesize plans and execute actions within seconds or minutes in response to user prompts.
By Roxana Geambasu, Mariana Raykova, Pierre Tholoniat, Trishita Tiwari, Lillian Tsai, Wen Zhang
arXiv:2607. 23933v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLM agents increasingly rely on the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to invoke isolated external sandboxes, disaggregated sandbox deployment introduces a fundamental tension between resource utilization and interactive tail latency.
By Yihui Zhang (Beihang University), Tianyu Wo (Beihang University), Jinghao Wang (Beihang University), Xiaoyang Sun (University of Leeds), Menghao Zhang (Beihang University), Cangzhou Yuan (Beihang University), Li Li (Beihang University), Chunming Hu (Beihang University), Albert Y. Zomaya (The University of Sydney), Renyu Yang (Beihang University)
Agent Seer is a pipeline that automatically synthesizes realistic evaluation scenarios for AI agents that use external tools, using only the tool’s specification (function names, natural‑language descriptions, and typed parameter schemas). Starting from a single Model Context Protocol (MCP) specification, it enriches raw schemas, generates graded scenarios with synthetic tool outputs, and expands them into mock‑data‑grounded multi‑turn dialogues that demonstrate strong tool‑calling correctness and conversational coherence. Across seven diverse MCP specifications, the pipeline achieves high quality, with parameter‑schema complexity emerging as the main driver of quality variation and argument‑value accuracy identified as the dominant failure mode.
By Harish Karumuri, Mahesh Vemula, David Lopes Pegna
The paper surveys how large language models (LLMs) are being used in hardware verification, covering tasks such as assertion generation, testbench creation, bug localization, and formal reasoning. It categorizes the literature by methodology, verification goal, tool interaction, benchmarks, and evaluation metrics, and distinguishes between inference-time techniques (prompting, retrieval, structured reasoning, agentic workflows) and training-time adaptation. The authors highlight that LLMs excel as semantic reasoning, search, and orchestration components within verification workflows, yet emphasize the need for semantic alignment, scalable integration, generalization, and rigorous evaluation to ensure true verification correctness.
By Hao Zheng, Jaime Rafael Imperial, Bardia Nadimi, Xiangfei Kong
GatewayBench is a new evaluation framework that systematically studies how the design of Model Context Protocol (MCP) gateways influences AI agent capability, efficiency, and security. It categorizes gateways into flattened and hierarchical architectures and tests them on 524 tasks across six domains using a pool of 11,118 real-world tools from 251 MCP servers, including task-irrelevant tools to simulate large-scale deployments. Experiments on seven widely deployed gateways reveal significant differences in task completion, tool-use efficiency, and attack resilience, showing strong interactions with the underlying model and agent harness.
By Yitian Zheng, Zhaorun Chen, Haoyu Li, Bo Li
arXiv:2609.24161v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: As LLM agents increasingly interact with external tools through standardized protocols such as MCP, tool-interface design becomes a critical yet unde...
By Demetris Paschalides, Moysis Symeonides, George Pallis, Marios D. Dikaiakos
QiMeng-ChipV-RTL is a multi‑agent framework that tackles the challenges of generating Register‑Transfer Level (RTL) code for industrial IP‑level hardware design. By partitioning long design documents into short, localized tasks and using hierarchical planning, localized code generation, interface‑consistent merging, and AST‑guided debugging, it scales to complex specifications. Experiments on the RealBench benchmark show ChipV-RTL achieves a 45.0% pass rate, outperforming state‑of‑the‑art LLMs and agents which reach only 21.6%.
By Hanqi Lyu, Di Huang, Yaoyu Zhu, Kangcheng Liu, Bohan Dou, Chongxiao Li, Pengwei Jin, Shuyao Cheng, Rui Zhang, Zidong Du, Qi Guo, Xing Hu, Yunji Chen
arXiv:2605. 27898v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents, reliable assessment of their agentic capabilities has become essential.
By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao
arXiv:2606. 14350v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems must typically satisfy service-level objectives including accuracy, latency, and cost.
By Milos Gravara, Andrija Stanisic, Stefan Nastic