arXiv:2609.15702v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Pretrained score-based diffusion models provide strong unconditional priors, yet enforcing measurement or physics consistency in inverse problems is of...
By Zihao Wang
arXiv:2609.14596v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Training-free diffusion inverse solvers typically choose between local measurement guidance and costly clean-space posterior updates. Independent poste...
By Qi Yu, Hanlin Wu, Xiaohui Sun
arXiv:2608. 05600v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow-based generative models are typically sampled by solving a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE), whereas online reinforcement learning requires stochastic rollouts for policy exploration and optimization.
By Yingqing Guo, Hui Yuan, Zijian He, Mengdi Wang, Zheng Ding
Flow-based generative models are typically sampled by solving a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE), whereas online reinforcement learning requires stochastic rollouts for policy exploration and optimization. Existing GRPO methods for flow models therefore replace the inference-time ODE with a stochastic differential equation (SDE) during training.
arXiv:2606. 13240v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A key strength of diffusion models lies in their flexibility, since their outputs can be controlled at sampling time through guidance.
By Rapha\"el Razafindralambo, R\'emy Sun, Fr\'ed\'eric Precioso, Jes Frellsen, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei
The paper investigates training diffusion models to sample from distributions defined by unnormalized densities or energy functions. It benchmarks various diffusion-structured inference techniques, including simulation-based variational methods and off-policy approaches such as continuous generative flow networks, highlighting their relative strengths and challenging some prior claims. Additionally, the authors introduce a new exploration strategy for off-policy methods that employs local search in the target space with a replay buffer, demonstrating improved sample quality across multiple target distributions.
By Marcin Sendera, Minsu Kim, Sarthak Mittal, Pablo Lemos, Luca Scimeca, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Alexandre Adam, Yoshua Bengio, Esmeralda S. Whitammer
arXiv:2607. 23488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models expose many inference-time sampling parameters, including prompts, negative prompts, classifier-free guidance scales, and noise schedules.
By Arisrei Lim, Yossi Gandelsman
arXiv:2512.20003v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Sampling from unnormalized probability densities is a pervasive challenge across the computational and physical sciences. Diffusion models provide...
By Khaled Kahouli, Romuald Elie, Klaus-Robert M\"uller, Quentin Berthet, Oliver T. Unke, Arnaud Doucet
arXiv:2505. 16733v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper proposes to perform image restoration through a state-dependent mean-reverting forward diffusion (FoD) process.
By Ziwei Luo, Fredrik K. Gustafsson, Jens Sj\"olund, Thomas B. Sch\"on
arXiv:2506. 13058v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion probabilistic models (DPMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in visual generation.
By Hu Yu, Hao Luo, Xueyang Fu, Jie Huang, Fan Wang, Feng Zhao
arXiv:2608. 03117v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of generative diffusion models is determined by the choice of the reference diffusion process connecting the empirical and prior distributions.
By Kentaro Kaba, Masayuki Ohzeki, Yuki Sughiyama
arXiv:2606. 15048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion models are typically trained with objectives that focus on local denoising targets at individual time steps (or adjacent pairs), which do not enforce consistency between predictions along the denoising trajectory.
By Qizhen Ying, Yangchen Pan, Victor Adrian Prisacariu, Junfeng Wen