arXiv:2607. 24665v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern large language models scale successfully by pairing capacity growth with efficiency, keeping per-token and deployment costs under control as capacity grows.
By Yanhao Jia, Jiepeng Wang, Haibin Huang, Chi Zhang, Erik Cambria, Xuelong Li
arXiv:2608. 07890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models decouple total parameters from per-token compute, but deployment still requires storing every expert.
By Ali Janati, Kaoutar El Maghraoui, Xinyi Luo, Wenyuan Shen, Owen Zou, Yankai Mao
arXiv:2505. 17639v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models offer dynamic computation, but are typically deployed as static full-capacity models, missing opportunities for deployment-specific specialization.
By Zehua Pei, Ying Zhang, Hui-Ling Zhen, Tao Yuan, Xianzhi Yu, Zhenhua Dong, Sinno Jialin Pan, Mingxuan Yuan, Bei Yu
arXiv:2608. 04401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models enable model scaling while maintaining low inference-time compute by activating only a subset of experts per token.
By Robin Pan, Raymond Liu, Daniel Fang, Adelina Andrei, Rosa Wu
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models enable model scaling while maintaining low inference-time compute by activating only a subset of experts per token. However, conventional routing relies on a fixed top-k selection, forcing the model to spend the same compute regardless of how many experts are relevant.
arXiv:2602. 06154v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models scale large language models efficiently by sparsely activating experts, but once an expert is selected, it is executed fully.
By Nurbek Tastan, Stefanos Laskaridis, Karthik Nandakumar, Samuel Horvath
arXiv:2607. 26052v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) variants of Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) route every token to a fixed number of experts $k$.
By Tom Saliencro, Rohan Desai, Priya Nair, Maya Lindqvist, Daniel Whitmore
arXiv:2607. 10593v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Normalization is a critical component for stabilizing Transformer training, yet the choice between static strategies such as Layer Normalization (LN) and adaptive alternatives remains largely task-dependent.
By Piyush Kaushik Bhattacharyya, Divyanshu Rai, Swastik Singh, Kumar Aakash, Ayush Ranjan, Krutika Verma
arXiv:2608. 01997v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Single-optimizer training is a poor fit for the distinct phases of deep network optimization: adaptive methods handle noisy early gradients well but overshoot flat minima, while SGD with momentum generalizes better in the late phase but converges slowly early on.
By Alok Kumar Pandey, Umang Chaturvedi, Aatish Rana, Gopi Krishna Nedanuri
arXiv:2606. 10338v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine unlearning is increasingly important for large language models, yet unlearning in Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures remains underexplored.
By Jingyi Xie, Yijun Lin, Yinjiang Xiong, Zhikun Zhang, Sai Li
arXiv:2608. 04407v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory-efficient matrix optimizers such as Sinkhorn gradient descent remove most AdamW optimizer state for dense Transformer matrices, but direct application to Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) training is unreliable.
By Masato Fujitake
arXiv:2608. 11688v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models are attractive for edge deployment because they provide high model capacity while activating only a small subset of parameters per token, improving compute efficiency.
By Alish Kanani, Layan Badawi, Umit Y. Ogras