Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models enable model scaling while maintaining low inference-time compute by activating only a subset of experts per token. However, conventional routing relies on a fixed top-k selection, forcing the model to spend the same compute regardless of how many experts are relevant.
arXiv:2606. 01509v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models scale by activating only a small subset of experts per token.
By Heng Zhao, Zilei Shao, Guy Van den Broeck, Zhe Zeng
arXiv:2607. 08780v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models activate only a sparse subset of experts per token, yet consecutive tokens frequently activate different experts -- causing constant weight swapping between slow storage and fast memory on edge devices.
By Ali Kayyam
arXiv:2411. 00918v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mixture of experts (MoE) architectures have become a cornerstone for scaling up and are a key component in most large language models such as GPT-OSS, DeepSeek-V3, Llama-4, and Gemini-2.
By Nam V. Nguyen, Thong T. Doan, Luong Tran, Van Nguyen, Quang Pham
ACE introduces a training‑free, calibration‑free framework for adaptive expert skipping in Mixture‑of‑Experts LLMs. It combines a Global Spectral Proxy that estimates global transformation capacity with a Router‑Conditioned Refinement that builds expert‑specific direction prototypes, enabling the model to skip low‑contribution experts while always keeping the top‑1 expert. Offline computation of expert statistics leaves only lightweight table lookups during inference, and experiments on three MoE‑based LLMs show ACE outperforms static and dynamic baselines, especially at high skipping ratios.
By Zukang Xu, Zhixiong Zhao, Xing Hu, Jiangyong Yu, Houji Wen, Jun Li, Zhe Jiang, Dawei Yang
The paper presents a statistical framework for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, treating them as localized aggregation systems. It derives oracle risk bounds that separate approximation, expert‑learning, and router‑estimation errors for both dense and sparse routing with evolving experts. The authors also analyze how sparse Top‑K routing balances computational cost with performance, interpret gating geometrically, and explain how shared experts can capture common predictive structure while allowing routed experts to focus on local residuals.
By Siyuan He, Bokai Yang, Jie Hu, Ziwen Gao, Yuhong Yang