arXiv:2512. 20872v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Function call graphs (FCGs) have emerged as a powerful abstraction for malware detection, capturing the behavioral structure of applications beyond surface-level signatures.
By Jakir Hossain, Jue Guo, Gurvinder Singh, Lukasz Ziarek, Ahmet Erdem Sar{\i}y\"uce
HYDRA is a proactive Android malware drift adaptation framework that learns drift‑invariant representations from hierarchically structured data. It combines fine‑grained Control Flow Graphs and coarse‑grained Function Call Graphs to model applications, then applies a cross‑domain contrastive learning objective to align historical and new data distributions. Experiments on large‑scale, time‑ordered malware datasets show HYDRA achieves lower false negative and false positive rates than state‑of‑the‑art baselines while needing up to 87.5% fewer labeled samples.
By Han Chen, Hanchen Wang, Hongmei Chen, Lu Qin, Wenjie Zhang, Ying Zhang
arXiv:2605. 09028v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning-based Android malware detectors often fail in real-world deployment due to domain shift, where models trained on one data source perform poorly on applications from another.
By Md Rafid Islam
arXiv:2606. 16072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Compared with binaries and decompiled code, malware source code more directly reflects the attackers' original intent.
By Bojing Li, Duo Zhong, Prajna Bhandary, Raguvir S, Charles Maxa, Robert J Joyce, Charles Nicholas
arXiv:2608. 02084v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Binary function embedding models are trained to encode the semantics of binary code in such a way that they can be generalized to a variety of reverse engineering tasks, such as binary code search, vulnerability detection, or malware classification.
By Samuel Valenzuela, Johannes Kinder
arXiv:2605. 24903v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning based malware detectors become obsolete over time due to concept drift in benign and malware applications.
By Suresh Kumar Amalapuram, Bikraj Shresta, Siva Ram murthy Chebiyam, Bheemarjuna Reddy Tamma, Sumohana S Channappayya
arXiv:2606. 26707v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adversarial APKs are Android applications modified in the problem space to evade machine-learning malware detectors.
By Christian Scano, Diego Soi, Angelo Sotgiu, Luca Demetrio, Davide Maiorca, Giorgio Giacinto, Fabio Roli, Battista Biggio
arXiv:2503.11841v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) malware detectors rely heavily on crowd-sourced AntiVirus (AV) labels, with platforms like VirusTotal serving as truste...
By Tianwei Lan, Luca Demetrio, Farid Nait-Abdesselam, Yufei Han, Simone Aonzo
arXiv:2607. 03350v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Malicious Python packages have become a major threat to software supply chain ecosystems due to the widespread adoption of open-source repositories such as PyPI.
By Hang Gao, Xiaoyu Chen, Baoquan Cui, Zhen Tang, Peng Qiao, Fengge Wu, Jian Zhang
arXiv:2512. 10485v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vulnerability detection methods based on deep learning (DL) have shown strong performance on benchmark datasets, yet their real-world effectiveness remains underexplored.
By Chaomeng Lu, Bert Lagaisse
arXiv:2608. 03250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of modern technology has led to a significant increase in the use of smart devices, such as smartphones and tablets, resulting in the widespread adoption of mobile applications.
By Md Faisal Ahmed, Zarin Tasnim Biash, Abu Raihan Shakil, Ahmed Ann Noor Ryen, Arman Hossain, Faisal Bin Ashraf, Muhammad Iqbal Hossain
The paper introduces Replicant, a deep reinforcement learning framework that learns to evade malware detectors under a strict label‑only black‑box threat model. Replicant generates reusable policies for modifying malware samples and deciding when to query the target, and it transfers across different samples, detectors, and feature spaces. In experiments on seven Android malware detectors and three feature spaces, Replicant achieves a mean attack success rate of 78.8%, outperforming state‑of‑the‑art methods by 20.9%–39.2% and providing a stronger signal for adversarial training to harden detectors.
By Shae McFadden, Ilias Tsingenopoulos, Mario D'Onghia, Alexander Herzog, Myles Foley, Chris Hicks, Lorenzo Cavallaro, Fabio Pierazzi