arXiv:2609.37532v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Growing large language model applications demand efficient inference. At high concurrency, block-diffusion speculative decoding suffers from verifica...
By Rongjian Chen, Minxian Xu, Zhengxin Fang, Kejiang Ye, Chengzhong Xu
arXiv:2606. 27474v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How should we evaluate generation systems that combine autoregressive (AR) and diffusion decoding?
By Aditi Gupta, Neel Mishra, Kushagra Trivedi, Pawan Kumar
Speculative decoding leverages idle CPU resources to accelerate token generation without altering model outputs. In vLLM benchmarks, DFlash achieved a 3.92× increase in autoregressive throughput using Qwen3.5‑9B on an Intel Xeon 6 at a concurrency of 1. The article details the origins of this speedup, discusses acceptance metrics, and outlines factors that influence when speculation is beneficial.
By Ehssan Khan
arXiv:2609.36173v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Parallel speculative drafting generates multiple candidates in one backbone pass, but independent token selection can produce inconsistent continuati...
By Haohui Zhang, Keyu Chen, Haocheng Sun, Weibo Gu, Ruizhi Qiao, Xing Sun, Bo Jiang
arXiv:2603. 18016v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates large language model inference by using a smaller draft model to propose draft tokens that are subsequently verified by a larger target model.
By Zhenwei Tang, Arun Verma, Zijian Zhou, Zhaoxuan Wu, Alok Prakash, Daniela Rus, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
arXiv:2607. 05147v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates Large Language Model (LLM) inference by decoupling draft generation from target verification.
By Xin Cheng, Xingkai Yu, Chenze Shao, Jiashi Li, Yunfan Xiong, Yi Qian, Jiaqi Zhu, Shirong Ma, Xiaokang Zhang, Jiasheng Ye, Qinyu Chen, Chengqi Deng, Jiping Yu, Damai Dai, Zhengyan Zhang, Yixuan Wei, Yixuan Tan, Wenkai Yang, Runxin Xu, Yu Wu, Zhean Xu, Xuanyu Wang, Muyang Chen, Rui Tian, Xiao Bi, Zhewen Hao, Shaoyuan Chen, Huanqi Cao, Wentao Zhang, Anyi Xu, Huishuai Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, Wenfeng Liang
The paper introduces DPara, a parallel speculative decoding framework that builds on DSpark-style parallel drafters. DPara eliminates the need for probabilistic guesses by precomputing draft representations for every acceptance boundary and using a lightweight autoregressive head to combine verification outcomes with these representations, enabling full parallelization of the backbone forward pass. Experiments on Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-14B across multiple benchmarks demonstrate average speedups of 3.21× and 3.52× over autoregressive decoding, outperforming existing serial and parallel speculative decoding methods.
By Fuliang Liu, Xue Li, Kun Qian, Zhibin Wang, Wanchun Dou, Wenyuan Yu, Chen Tian
arXiv:2607. 20475v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sampling in LLM inference comprises a combinatorial set of logit processing, token selection, and verification operations for speculative decoding.
By Pragaash Ponnusamy, Shivam Sahni, Jue Wang, Tri Dao
arXiv:2606. 20128v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmarks for LLM-generated GPU kernels (KernelBench, TritonBench, GEAK) score correctness through fixed-shape, small-sample allclose-style checks.
By Dipankar Sarkar
The paper introduces SPECTRA, a runtime‑reconfigurable tiled architecture designed to accelerate speculative decoding for large language models on edge devices. SPECTRA adapts its compute engine within each tile between systolic GEMM execution and vector‑lane GEMV execution, while dynamically adjusting tile count, kernel partitioning, and communication patterns across tiles. Experiments on a 20‑tile FPGA prototype demonstrate up to a 2.09× speedup from tile‑level reconfiguration and an additional 1.25× improvement from system‑level adaptability compared to fixed designs.
By Gabriele Tombesi, William Baisi, Je Yang, Elisavet Lydia Alvanaki, Kevin Lee, Michael Lippe, Biruk Seyoum, Luca P. Carloni
ASPIRE introduces a non‑synchronized batched self‑speculative decoding framework for long‑context LLM inference, addressing the memory bottleneck of attention by drafting tokens with sparse attention and verifying them with full attention. It combines a unified mixed forward pass, a lightweight online speculation scheduler that lets each request independently decide when to verify, and an intra‑draft refresh layer that updates the sparse context at every draft step. Experiments on three models and five benchmarks show 1.70–4.58× speedup over autoregressive baselines and a 27% average improvement over the strongest prior self‑speculative methods.
By Amir Ziashahabi, Hossein Entezari Zarch, Lei Gao, Murali Annavaram, Salman Avestimehr
arXiv:2609.24698v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Repeated execution of the target model during autoregressive decoding is a major source of LLM inference latency. Unlike linear speculation, which foll...
By Changxu Liu, Zhaogeng Li