arXiv AI

LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback

arXiv AI
Sep 21

Aligning with Lived Experience: Heterogeneous Benefits of Fine Tuning in Mental Health Support Generation

The paper introduces the COmmunity-centered Peer Engaged Support (COPES) dataset and a three‑axis evaluation framework to gauge how well Large Language Models (LLMs) align with community perspectives on mental‑health support queries. Experiments show that fine‑tuning LLMs on COPES improves strategy alignment and emotion‑tone alignment by over 50% for general‑purpose models, yet these gains are uneven across subreddits and coping strategies. The study also finds that post‑training shifts the model’s recommendations toward problem‑focused advice while reducing emotion‑focused responses, indicating persistent disparities in performance across different communities and needs.

By Mohit Chandra, Nabin Kim, Eli Min, Aamogh Sawant, Tanmay Sutar, Munmun De Choudhury
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Testing the Black Box: Structural Barriers to Independent Evaluation of Consumer-Facing Health LLMs

arXiv:2606. 08483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background: Consumer-facing large language models are now a common source of health information, and they interpret and personalize responses rather than retrieve them.

By Rahul Gorijavolu, Kaushik Madapati, Pritika Vig, Rawan Abulibdeh, Nikhil Jaiswal, Mahri Kadyrova, Zeamanuel Hailu Tesfaye, Charles Senteio, Paula Maurutto, Leo Anthony Celi
arXiv AI
Sep 4

User Perceptions vs. Proxy LLM Judges: Privacy and Helpfulness in LLM Responses to Privacy-Sensitive Scenarios

The study investigates how users perceive the helpfulness and privacy-preservation of large language model (LLM) responses in privacy-sensitive scenarios. Using 94 participants and 90 PrivacyLens scenarios, researchers found that users’ evaluations of identical LLM outputs varied widely, whereas five proxy LLM judges showed high agreement but low correlation with user judgments. The results suggest that proxy LLMs cannot reliably estimate users’ diverse perceptions of utility and privacy, highlighting the need for more user-centered evaluation methods.

By Xiaoyuan Wu, Roshni Kaushik, Wenkai Li, Lujo Bauer, Koichi Onoue
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

PersonaMem-v3: Toward Omni-Platform Personal Intelligence for Holistic User Understanding, Recommendation, and Agentic Tasks

PersonaMem-v3 is a benchmark and evaluation harness designed to assess omni-platform personal intelligence for AI agents. It is built from over one million anonymized real-world engagement histories, covering social media, chatbots, calendars, and AI companions, and tracks user preferences and habits over time. The benchmark tests agents on personalization, LLM-powered recommendation, proactiveness, agentic tool use, and geo-temporal reasoning, evaluating their ability to infer holistic user understanding, personalize responses, rerank recommendations, follow user steering, and avoid inappropriate personalization.

By Bowen Jiang, Yuan Yuan, Zhuoqun Hao, Yuchen Liu, Maohao Shen, Sihao Chen, Gregory Wornell, Chris Callison-Burch, Lyle Ungar, Dan Roth, Qi Guo, Xiangjun Fan, Camillo J. Taylor, Hanchao Yu
arXiv AI
5d ago

SocialArena: Evaluating Social Intelligence in Large Language Models

SocialArena is a benchmark designed to evaluate the social intelligence of large language models (LLMs) across three dimensions: role‑playing ability, mental state reasoning, and behavioral reasoning. It introduces a role‑playing dialogue paradigm with explicit character thinking to assess these capabilities in realistic human interactions, and a U‑TRIMF framework to synthesize diverse social contexts. The evaluation relies on a human‑annotated arena‑style protocol, supported by a $132.4K investment in recruiting and training annotators who compare model responses and provide preference labels and critiques.

By Zongqi Wang, Rui Wang, Yuchuan Wu, Hua Yang, Bingxue Qiu, Tianle Gu, Bing Zhao, Yujiu Yang, Jieping Ye, Yongbin Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 22

NodeSynth: Socially Aligned Synthetic Data for AI Evaluation

NodeSynth is a method that generates socially aligned synthetic data by combining a fine‑tuned taxonomy generator with credible sources and extracted sensitive attributes to produce queries that reflect real societal contexts and nuanced harms. In evaluations across ten open‑weight and proprietary large language models on Medical Advice and Self‑Harm tasks, NodeSynth outperformed generic synthetic baselines, structured synthetic benchmarks, and authentic human‑authored queries, inducing higher failure rates that highlight model vulnerabilities. Ablation and variance attribution studies show that the granular Level 3 taxonomic expansion and sociotechnical grounding of queries drive these failure rates, underscoring the importance of nuanced data for high‑stakes evaluation.

By Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Xuan Yang, Zhengzhe Yang, Yanzhou Pan, Erin van Liemt, Darlene Neal, Kshitij Pancholi, Jamila Smith-Loud
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 26

NodeSyn: Socially Aligned Synthetic Data for AI Evaluation

NodeSyn is a method that generates socially aligned synthetic data for evaluating AI models. It combines a fine‑tuned taxonomy generator with credible sources and sensitive attributes to produce queries that reflect real societal contexts and nuanced harms. In tests across ten LLMs in Medical Advice and Self‑Harm, NodeSyn outperformed generic synthetic baselines, raising failure rates significantly and revealing that failures stem from both topic selection and sociotechnical grounding.

By Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Xuan Yang, Zhengzhe Yang, Yanzhou Pan, Erin van Liemt, Darlene Neal, Kshitij Pancholi, Jamila Smith-Loud