The paper investigates how to design portfolios of agentic AI workflows that vary in reasoning strategy, verification structure, and compute cost. It proposes a portfolio-and-selector framework where multiple workflow executions are run and the best output is chosen, balancing additional compute with potential gains in accuracy. The authors develop exact and approximate optimization methods, evaluate them on three datasets, and show modest improvements over the best single workflow.
By Mojtaba Abdolmaleki, Stefanus Jasin, Boyu Wang
arXiv:2606. 11290v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are increasingly powerful, but current agentic workflow optimization paradigms make an unsatisfying trade-off.
By Lingzhi Yuan, Chenghao Deng, Fangxu Yu, Souradip Chakraborty, Mohammad Rostami, Furong Huang
arXiv:2607. 13034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task actually requires.
By Junjie Yin, Xinyu Feng
arXiv:2609.01045v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities as powerful components in agentic systems, enabling sophisticated reasoning and...
By Enci Zhang, Haofeng Wang, Yuesheng Zhu, Xiaole Cui, Guibo Luo
arXiv:2608.25992v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) workflows have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving complex, open-ended tasks through collaborative re...
By Songyuan Li, Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem, Shiqiang Wang
arXiv:2604. 05164v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As LLM reasoning performance plateaus, improving inference-time compute efficiency is crucial to mitigate overthinking and long thinking traces even for simple queries.
By Neharika Jali, Anupam Nayak, Gauri Joshi
arXiv:2608.29397v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Tool-use benchmarks generally evaluate whether an agent completes a workflow using appropriate tools and valid arguments. However, feasibility alone is...
By Zixiang Xu, Jiaan Wang, Fandong Meng
arXiv:2606. 04402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern reasoning models can allocate different amounts of test-time computation, such as thinking tokens, model calls, or compute budget, to different tasks.
By Jingbo Wen, Liang He, Ziqi He
arXiv:2607. 24162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Optimizing agentic workflows, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines, requires navigating a combinatorial space of discrete component choices under tight evaluation budgets.
By Yang Li, Hai Liu, Dian Shao, Yu Wang, Xiyu Chen, Sergey Volkov, Bozhi Wang, Ziyu Sun, Sihang Liu, Ye Luo, Xiaowei Zhang
arXiv:2608. 05519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent benchmarks usually measure task completion and treat resource use as an auxiliary statistic.
By Jie Wu, Ming Gong, Feixiang Cheng, Qinqin Zhao
arXiv:2607. 20468v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are increasingly used to automate research and development tasks, yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate them on prescribed workflows or narrow action spaces.
By Jehyeok Yeon, Ben Rank, Maksym Andriushchenko
Optimizing agentic workflows, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines, requires navigating a combinatorial space of discrete component choices under tight evaluation budgets. Existing approaches - heuristic search, black-box optimization, and standard tree search methods - do not explicitly exploit the compositional structure of these workflows, leading to redundant computation and inefficient budget allocation.