The paper introduces BenchAgent, a framework for evaluating multi‑agent large language model (LLM) workflows against a single‑agent baseline, BenchAgent Core. Using GPT‑4.1 across ten reasoning, coding, and tool‑use benchmarks, the study compares six multi‑agent configurations, finding that EvoAgent achieves the highest mean pooled accuracy (79.70%) while other agents lag by 1.71–8.76 percentage points. The analysis also highlights trade‑offs in token consumption and accuracy, offering guidance for selecting and optimizing LLM multi‑agent workflows.
By Yuhang Fu, Ruishan Fang, Jiaqi Shao, Huiyu Zheng, Zhengtao Zhu, Bing Luo, Zhenyu Wen, Tao Lin
arXiv:2609.15309v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents allocate test-time compute adaptively as they revise solutions, use tools, explore alternatives, and decide when to s...
By Kaiyuan Liu, Qiuyang Mang, Bo Peng, Wenhao Chai, Hanchen Li, Shreyas Pimpalgaonkar, Luke Zettlemoyer, Alex Dimakis, Alvin Cheung
MLExpert is a 35B Mixture-of-Experts agentic model designed to autonomously perform long‑horizon machine learning engineering (MLE) tasks. It uses a post‑training method that combines hierarchical agentic supervised fine‑tuning with Windowed Interaction RL to learn from intermediate outcomes in complex experimentation workflows. On the MLE‑Bench Lite benchmark, MLExpert raises the average medal rate from 37.9% to 72.7%, matching the performance of larger frontier models and demonstrating generalizable optimization capabilities across related tasks.
By Shangheng Du, Jinxin Shi, Shuaiyu Zhang, Yiming Wu, Junpeng Zhao, Shiyang Feng, Xin Li, Liang He, Xiangchao Yan, Bo Zhang
MLExpert is a 35B Mixture-of-Experts agentic model designed to autonomously conduct long‑horizon machine learning engineering (MLE) tasks. It uses a post‑training approach that combines hierarchical supervised fine‑tuning with Windowed Interaction RL to learn from intermediate outcomes in complex experimentation workflows. On the MLE‑Bench Lite benchmark, MLExpert raises the average medal rate from 37.9% to 72.7%, matching the performance of larger frontier models and demonstrating transferable optimization capabilities to other benchmarks such as NatureBench Lite.
arXiv:2609.14138v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: As LLM agents become integrated into increasingly complex workflows, they must continually acquire new capabilities while retaining competence on pre...
By Siddharth Sharma, Nilesh Prasad Pandey, Onat Gungor, Tajana Rosing
arXiv:2607. 20468v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are increasingly used to automate research and development tasks, yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate them on prescribed workflows or narrow action spaces.
By Jehyeok Yeon, Ben Rank, Maksym Andriushchenko
arXiv:2610.08155v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have become a promising paradigm for complex information-seeking and reasoning tasks by en...
By Zihan Zhou, Xinzhe Hu, Hanxu Yang, Liangjian Wen, Zhao Kang
arXiv:2609.08248v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Modern industrial ads ranking stacks are increasingly bottlenecked not by model capacity or training compute, but by the throughput of human ML iterati...
By Erwin Gao, Vinodh Kumar Sunkara, Jingyi Guan, Qinjin Jia, Hangjun Xu, Xiang Ji, Sherman Wong, Surya Teja Chavali, Pratik Vaishnavi, Aryan Pandhi, Xiaoyu Deng, Zhaodong Wang, Samarth Inani, Fan Yang, Jakob Moberg, Zoe Zu, Nicolas Bievre, Sami Khenissi, Amit Jaspal, Ehsan Fakharizadi, Srinidhi Viswanathan, Dorothy Sun, Abishek Vanam, Sneha Iyer, Sheela Yadawad, Wenjie Chen, Gaby Nahum, Junhua Gu, Peter Chu, Yucheng Liu, Xin Zhao, Vitor Cid, Chaorong Chen, Vijay Pappu, Ashwin Kumar, Wenlin Chen, Ben Schulte, Deepak Chandra, Ritwik Tewari
arXiv:2606. 25207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) is essential for maximizing machine learning model performance, and its core challenge is sample efficiency: finding strong configurations within a limited budget.
By Taicheng Guo, Haomin Zhuang, Kehan Guo, Yujun Zhou, Nitesh V. Chawla, Olaf Wiest, Xiangliang Zhang
arXiv:2609.36887v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent efforts to scale tool-use post-training have largely centered on the synthesis of executable environments, which constitute only one component o...
By Bo Mao, Hang He, Linting Wang, Lizhi Lin, Maosen Zhou, Guanming Liu, Jinxiu Liu, Tianyu Huai, Chaoyun Zhang, Bingxuan Li, Kepeng Lei, Guanting Dong, Zhou Shao, Rui Zheng, Hang Yan, Jie Zhou, Chengcheng Wan, Tao Gui, Liang He, Xipeng Qiu
Agentick is a unified benchmark for sequential decision‑making agents that evaluates RL, LLM, VLM, hybrid, and human agents on 37 procedurally generated tasks across six capability categories, four difficulty levels, and five observation modalities via a single Gymnasium‑compatible interface. It includes a Coding API, oracle reference policies, pre‑built SFT datasets, a composable agent harness, and a live leaderboard. An evaluation of 27 configurations and over 90,000 episodes shows no single approach dominates, with GPT‑5 mini leading overall, PPO excelling in planning and multi‑agent tasks, and the reasoning harness boosting LLM performance by 3‑10×, while ASCII observations outperform natural language.
By Roger Creus Castanyer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Glen Berseth
MetaExp is a framework that trains language‑model agents to learn reusable experience across tasks by using verifiable cross‑task environment scaling. It introduces two designs—Shared‑Tool families that keep black‑box tools constant and Shared‑Workflow families that preserve latent procedures—allowing agents to acquire operational and procedural experience respectively. After fine‑tuning Qwen3.5‑122B‑A10B on thousands of trajectories from 1,000 task families, MetaExp achieves significant performance gains on benchmarks such as SpreadsheetBench, APEX‑Agents, and AutomationBench, with improvements persisting even when domain‑excluded training is applied.
By Renhao Li, Xinjie Shen, Yang Su, Jianhong Tu, Derek F. Wong, Dayiheng Liu, Min Yang