The paper evaluates three retrieval strategies—Vector RAG, Tree Reasoning, and a new Adaptive Hybrid Retrieval (AHR)—on a small corpus of financial, legal, and medical documents, using a four‑tier query complexity benchmark and LLM‑as‑judge evaluation. Tree Reasoning achieves the highest overall score (0.900), but AHR excels on cross‑reference queries (0.850) and all methods tie on multi‑section queries (0.929). Vector RAG shows the lowest latency (1.61 s) and performs best on single multi‑document queries (0.900).
arXiv:2603. 26815v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for financial document QA typically follow a chunk-based paradigm: documents are split into fragments, embedded, and retrieved by similarity.
arXiv:2605. 05409v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Financial document question answering (QA) demands complex multi-step numerical reasoning over heterogeneous evidence--structured tables, textual narratives, and footnotes--scattered across corporate filings.
arXiv:2607. 23006v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific question answering requires a retrieval system to solve two distinct problems: identifying which papers are relevant and locating the supporting evidence within those papers.
RIT‑RAG is a retrieval‑augmented generation framework that combines content retrieval with structural navigation of documents. It builds a tree for each document from its table of contents or sitemap, then uses retrieved chunk positions to induce manageable sub‑trees that an LLM agent can navigate, read selectively, and reformulate queries. Experiments on financial, scientific, and customer‑support benchmarks show RIT‑RAG outperforms vanilla, graph‑based, and agentic baselines, achieving up to 11.4‑point accuracy gains on the new EntQABench of 2.84 million technical‑documentation webpages.
arXiv:2608.29753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-hop question answering in retrieval-augmented gener?ation (RAG) often benefits from retrieving beyond the few candidates that will finally be rea...
Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph Expansion, RRF Fusion, and Per-Chunk Grounded Evaluation for Enterprise Document Search describes DocuSearch, an offline multi‑agent system designed for telecom network operations. The system combines semantic vector search, BM25 full‑text search, and knowledge‑graph neighbor expansion, merges the results via Reciprocal Rank Fusion, and reranks with a cross‑encoder before pruning with Maximal Marginal Relevance. A per‑chunk evaluation loop ensures only grounded answers are returned, achieving Precision@10 of 0.69, Recall@10 of 0.79, and an 89.6% grounding rate—improvements of 15, 16, and 18.4 percentage points over a dense‑only baseline.
arXiv:2606. 04646v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many real-world questions over business, legal, and scientific corpora are natural-language versions of database-style queries over records latent in text.
arXiv:2606. 00822v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Skill-based LLM agents increasingly rely on long procedural documents, but full-document prompting wastes tokens and dilutes information critical to execution.
The paper investigates whether a knowledge graph can enhance retrieval for enterprise retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) systems compared to traditional similarity search. Using a snapshot of SEC EDGAR filings, the authors built a graph with 430,257 nodes and 561,144 edges, then evaluated three architectures—text‑to‑SQL, dense‑vector RAG, and a two‑stage GraphRAG. GraphRAG outperformed the other methods, correctly answering 16 of 20 questions across all attempts, while the other approaches lagged behind, especially in structured aggregation and single‑document queries.
FinRCA-Bench is a synthetic benchmark designed to evaluate evidence retrieval and reasoning in financial AI systems, specifically for accounts‑payable‑to‑bank reconciliation. It contains 2,250 cases across 14 operational tables, with 1,500 injected failures in 15 causal categories and 750 hard‑negative cases, and hides root‑cause labels and evidence contracts to isolate retrieval performance. Experiments show that retrieval architecture dramatically affects accuracy, with structured retrieval methods like Typed Provenance Graph Retrieval vastly improving macro‑recall and exact‑class accuracy compared to dense semantic retrieval or classical ML.
FinRCA-Bench is a deterministic synthetic benchmark comprising 2,250 accounts‑payable‑to‑bank reconciliation cases that span 14 operational tables and include 1,500 injected failures across 15 causal categories. The benchmark hides root‑cause labels and record‑level evidence contracts from models, enabling independent evaluation of evidence retrieval versus reasoning accuracy. Experiments show that retrieval architecture dramatically influences performance, with retrieval improvements raising macro‑required‑record recall from 0.83% to 77.70% and exact 16‑class accuracy from 2.05% to 72.44%.
The paper introduces FLINT, a domain‑specialized Text‑to‑SQL system designed for complex financial databases where data is stored as opaque integer keys. FLINT employs a lookup agent to resolve natural‑language concepts, uses embedding‑based retrieval of query templates from a compact expert‑authored bank, and prunes large schemas by traversing foreign‑key chains. Evaluated on 359 questions across two production financial schemas, FLINT outperforms state‑of‑the‑art baselines and is already deployed in a financial data retrieval service.