arXiv AI

When Should AI Follow? Task Structure and Joint Adaptation by Human and AI Agents

arXiv:2504. 20903v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: How should organizations divide and sequence decision tasks between human and artificial agents?

arXiv AI
Sep 11

Cognitive Amplification vs Cognitive Delegation in Human-AI Systems: A Metric Framework

The paper proposes a metric framework to differentiate cognitive amplification—where AI enhances human performance without eroding human capability—from cognitive delegation, which relies heavily on AI reasoning. It introduces four metrics (CAI*, D, HRI, HCDR) and tests them in NetLogo simulations across various reliance and dependency scenarios. The results show that positive collaborative gain is only achievable when an explicit interaction term is added, indicating that mere prevention of capability erosion is insufficient for genuine amplification.

By Eduardo Di Santi, Carla Florida
arXiv AI
Jul 21

First-Order Predictable but Pairwise Fragile: Local Task Adaptation in Trained Transformers

arXiv:2607. 16821v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Task arithmetic, sequential fine-tuning, activation steering, and first-order random search all operate through relatively small perturbations around an already trained checkpoint, and they rely on different local approximations: individual perturbations should be first-order predictable, task updates should compose with controlled interference, useful tangent structure should be stable and possible to estimate, and weight edits should have counterparts in representation space.

By Irina Piontkovskaia, Sergey Nikolenko
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails

arXiv:2609.09134v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent harnesses (the system prompt, tool set, execution hooks, and context-management scaffolding around a model) are a critical determinant of agentic...

By Zhou Yu, Bin Bi, Shiva Kumar Pentyala, Shubham Mehrotra, Sougata Chaudhuri, Shilpa Bhagavath, Zeyuan Chen, Ran Xu, Phil Mui, James Zhu, Sitaram Asur
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Recursive Experiential-Working Memory Evolution for Long-Horizon Agent Harnesses

The paper introduces Recuris, a recursive Experiential‑Working Memory architecture that lets long‑horizon agents track task progress and select skills based on current needs rather than full history. By coupling working memory with experiential memory, execution becomes structured evidence that localizes failures to specific memory components, enabling a bounded recursive memory‑evolution loop. Across four benchmarks and ten models, Recuris improves task success in 35 of 37 model‑benchmark pairs, raising state‑of‑the‑art performance on tau‑bench and SkillFlow and reducing common long‑horizon failures by up to 80%.

By Zhaochen Yu, Yingcheng Wu, Zhenfei Yin, Kaiyuan Chen, Zhe Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Shuicheng Yan, Ling Yang
arXiv AI
Sep 3

CHIME: Credit-Aware Hierarchical Memory Evolution for Long-Horizon Agentic Planning

CHIME introduces a credit‑aware hierarchical memory evolution framework that separates planning and execution experiences into distinct memory banks. By attributing each task outcome to the plan, execution, both, or neither before memorization, CHIME mitigates bias from noisy final outcomes and improves long‑horizon agent planning. Experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that CHIME outperforms existing training‑based and self‑evolving memory methods, requires fewer memory items, and transfers effectively across backbone models.

By Yongshi Ye, Tian Lan, Feihu Jiang, Muyang Ye, Bin Zhu, Qianghuai Jia, Longyue Wang, Zhao Xu, Weihua Luo, Xiaodong Shi
arXiv AI
Sep 18

An Architecture for Long-Horizon Agents: Levels, Ticks and Cascaded Intelligence

The paper proposes a hierarchical architecture for long-horizon language‑model agents that must operate over days or weeks without forgetting. It introduces three key components: time‑scale levels that store bounded summaries, a clocked tick as the basic action unit, and cascaded intelligence that escalates tasks to more capable models only after review failures. A ten‑day experiment demonstrated that the agent maintained continuity across context resets, adapted its behavior based on early knowledge, and identified where learned components could be integrated.

By Erik Nijkamp, Anurag Koul, Egor Pakhomov, Bo Pang