arXiv:2607. 09818v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models aim to understand natural-language instructions and visual observations, and to generate and execute corresponding actions as embodied agents.
By Shengzhuo Yang, Ronghao Yu, Chuanjie Lv, Linpeng Peng, Hang Yu, Jie Ren, Jiajun Lv, Yong Liu
arXiv:2609.23565v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models integrate vision-language understanding with executable robot actions, enabling end-to-end learning for robot contr...
By Yuxuan Jiang, Jiaying Huang, Ge Wang, Shenhao Yan, Jiahao Yang, Chengsi Yao, Qi Liu, Qing Zhao, Shuguang Cui, Yiming Zhao, Yatong Han, Zhen Li
arXiv:2607. 11498v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models predict robot actions from visual observations and language instructions.
By Byungkun Lee, Dongyoon Hwang, Dongjin Kim, Hojoon Lee, Minho Park, Jaegul Choo
arXiv:2510. 01711v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown strong capabilities in robot manipulation by leveraging rich representations from pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs).
By Taeyoung Kim, Jimin Lee, Myungkyu Koo, Dongyoung Kim, Kyungmin Lee, Changyeon Kim, Younggyo Seo, Jinwoo Shin
arXiv:2610.21306v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models transfer semantic knowledge acquired through vision-language pretraining to robot control, achieving strong perform...
By Qi Lu, Jiarun Li, Ce Zhang, Miao Pan, Yi Pan, Xu Wang, Wenqi Zhang, Xuhong Zhang
arXiv:2609.34792v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Long-horizon manipulation requires robots to remember cues that are no longer in view while responding to moving objects. Yet vision-language-actio...
By Zijian Ye, Chengqi Wei, Wei Huang, Anlin Zheng, Chunyu Zou, Liangyu Wu, Zikang Zhao, Zhenjie Peng, Yushuo Yang, Shuman Zhao, Zhongrui Wang, Xiaojuan Qi
The paper investigates adding Greek language support to a Cosmos3 vision‑language‑action robot policy using only machine‑rephrased instructions and no architectural changes. It finds that many evaluation metrics can give misleading results, and that multilingual training with Greek yields a modest 6.7‑7.1 point advantage over a control, reaching about 40% of English performance. The study also shows that overfitting to a single translator’s phrasing can be mitigated by training on multiple phrasings, while warm‑starting from a language‑adapted world model or unfreezing the text tower actually harms performance.
By Ayoub Kirouane, Georgios Giaples, Christos Petrocheilos
arXiv:2610.01939v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision language model (VLM) agents can control robots through visual feedback and action primitives, but repeated model invocations and redundant obser...
By Ruiyang Si, Jianxin Bi, Shunyu Yang, Rui Ni, Wenbo Huang, Qiang Wang, Shulong Jiang, Duomin Wang, Xiuyu Li, Haiwen Feng, Zhen Dong, Daquan Zhou
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated effectiveness in robot manipulation, yet state-of-the-art models such as pi0.5 operate under a single-frame paradigm, limiting their ability to re...
The paper introduces Action–Future Coupled Effect Learning (AFCE), a method that shifts the primary prediction target of vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies from action chunks to future‑grounded physical Effects. AFCE constructs temporally ordered Effect tokens from demonstrations, robot responses, and visual transitions, and uses reconstruction objectives to preserve executable detail and physical change. On the DexJoCo benchmark, AFCE achieves a 50.97% overall success rate, outperforming baseline policies by 11.82 and 15.21 percentage points and excelling on all five bimanual tasks, underscoring the benefit of Effect supervision for coordinated dexterous manipulation.
By Min Lin, Bokai Zhou, Jianqi Lin, Kaiyuan Yang, Yicheng Chang, Junjie Yu, Xiaofan Liu, Jianhua Han, Rui Li, Shen Zhao, Xiaodan Liang
arXiv:2511. 18960v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown remarkable progress in embodied tasks recently, but most methods process visual observations independently at each timestep.
By Lei Xiao, Jifeng Li, Juntao Gao, Feiyang Ye, Yan Jin, Jingjing Qian, Jing Zhang, Yong Wu, Xiaoyuan Yu