arXiv AI

NeSySpec: Neuro-Symbolic Technical Intelligence for Auditing Engineering Specifications with an Application to Aircraft

NeSySpec is a neuro‑symbolic audit framework that uses Logic Tensor Networks to evaluate engineering specifications, detect violations, identify altered fields, propose minimal corrections, and link image evidence to parts. It learns tolerances from real records and integrates all audit outputs into a single verification report. The system was validated on 107 aircraft types, achieving superior macro‑F1 scores and higher accuracy in diagnosing constraints and locating altered fields compared to existing methods.

arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

A Bounded Evaluation Protocol for Representational Systematicity

The paper introduces Bounded-RS, a protocol for testing whether neural networks are representationally systematic. It evaluates explanations by checking if the claimed representation is recoverable and causally used, then classifies the explanation into one of four states: Unsupported, Present-only, Causal-use, or Undetermined. Applied to a semantic‑parsing benchmark, the protocol finds that T5’s role‑filler Binding explanation is Causal‑use while its Geometry explanation is Unsupported, and it demonstrates high reliability across different configurations.

By Boyu Cao, Wenshuo Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

Conflicted Records: Typed Adversarial Contracts for Auditable LLM Output Quality Enforcement

The paper introduces BiasGuard‑D, a system that uses two adversarial language‑model agents from different families to exchange typed claim documents, with a third model quorum voting to adjudicate. A combined referential‑plus‑semantic invariant validates the verdict, and the iterative deliberation layer shifts remediation from stereotypes to hallucinations, improving right‑answer recovery by 49 percentage points on HaluEval QA. All claims, votes, and instructions are stored as typed records, providing an auditable provenance trail for operators under emerging AI regulations.

By Kardelen Subasi, Jaros{\l}aw A. Chudziak
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Not All Confusion Is Equal: A Source-Aware Uncertainty Diagnosis for Fine-Grained Aircraft Detection

The paper introduces $A^2E^2$, a diagnostic framework that decomposes confusion in fine‑grained aircraft detection into four distinct, measurable sources: affinity, heterogeneity, contested, and collapsed. By attributing each source to either aleatoric or epistemic uncertainty and within‑ or between‑class distinctions, the method provides actionable remedies and experimentally verifies that targeted interventions reduce the identified source without affecting irreducible ones. This turns passive confusion matrices into a concrete, validatable diagnosis that can guide model improvement.

By Hai Huang, Helmut Mayer
arXiv AI
Jul 29

Why Does Grounding Hurt Medical VQA? Benchmarking, Diagnosis, and Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2604. 27720v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to medical visual question answering (Med-VQA), yet whether they can \emph{localize} the evidence behind their answers---a prerequisite for clinical auditability---is poorly characterized.

By Xupeng Chen, Binbin Shi, Chenqian Le, Qifu Yin, Lang Lin, Haowei Ni, Ran Gong, Panfeng Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 24

When Graph-JEPA Learns the Wrong Thing: Diagnosing and Repairing Category-Conditional Collapse

The paper investigates a failure mode in Graph-JEPA, a joint‑embedding predictive model trained on a large scientific‑reasoning graph. Despite achieving high linear‑probe accuracy and effective rank, the learned representation contains almost no usable instance information, as shown by retrieval metrics. The authors diagnose the issue to variance allocation in the objective, propose a repair that restores near‑perfect information recovery, and demonstrate that the problem persists even after repair, highlighting limitations in the evaluation metrics used.

By Gollam Rabby, S\"oren Auer