arXiv AI
Jul 17
Introspection Fine-Tuning (IFT): Training Small LLMs to Introspect
arXiv:2607. 14111v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Can small language models detect and report on perturbations their own internal activations?
Human Values in a Single Sentence: Moral Presence, Hierarchies, and Transformer Ensembles on the Schwartz Continuum
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 24
SURGELLM: Rethinking Multi-Task Evaluation through Task-Aware Feature Gating with Class-Balanced Normalization
arXiv:2606. 24259v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuned encoders deployed across heterogeneous NLP tasks face three compounding problems: mismatched inductive biases, class-imbalance corruption of feature statistics, and no mechanism to condition attention on external lexical knowledge.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
SLMJury: Can Small Language Models Judge as Well as Large Ones?
arXiv:2606. 07810v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as judges for evaluating model outputs, but their high cost, latency, and opacity limit scalability.
arXiv AI
Jul 7
Detecting Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Grounding-Aware Sensitivity by Perturbation (GASP)
arXiv:2607. 04223v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) reduces but does not eliminate hallucination, and existing detectors return a single answer-level score that does not indicate which sentence is unsupported, or why.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Manac\'a-1B: An Open, Reproducible Brazilian-Portuguese Language Model and a Tokenizer-Aware, Paired Evaluation
Manacá-1B is a 1.72‑billion‑parameter, open decoder‑only language model trained from scratch for Brazilian Portuguese, released with a fully containerized, reproducible training pipeline and complete logs. The authors evaluate it against nine open baselines on four Portuguese benchmarks, reporting standard errors and paired significance tests, and find that Manacá-1B outperforms smaller models on LAMBADA‑PT while remaining competitive on commonsense completion. They also uncover a tokenizer‑related evaluation pitfall that can drastically lower accuracy and provide a simple fix, releasing all code, logs, and corrected tokenizer for full reproducibility.
arXiv AI
5d ago
LLMs or Naive Bayes? Old Gems or New Ways
The paper compares Complement Naive Bayes (NB) with zero‑shot and few‑shot large language models (LLMs) across a wide range of model sizes and text classification tasks. NB outperforms LLMs when labeled data is available, achieving comparable accuracy to large LLMs while running thousands of samples per second on a CPU. In zero‑data sentiment settings, LLMs still dominate, but NB remains the best choice for resource‑constrained HPC practitioners, and the authors provide a Kubernetes Helm operator to automate model selection.
arXiv AI
Jun 17
Do We Still Need Humans in the Loop? Comparing Human and LLM Annotation in Active Learning for Hostility Detection
arXiv:2604. 13899v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Instruction-tuned LLMs can annotate thousands of instances at low cost.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 18
Discrete Diffusion Language Models Are Training-Free Multi-Label Classifiers
arXiv:2608. 14649v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present dLLM-SetScore, a training-free method that uses discrete masked-diffusion language models for multi-label text classification.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27
Amplifying, Not Learning: The Price of Out-of-Distribution Generalization in AI-Text Detection
The paper shows that AI‑text detectors, rather than learning a clear AI‑versus‑human boundary, amplify an inherited predictability axis that already exists in language models. This amplification causes detectors to over‑flag fluent, formal human writing while missing high‑temperature AI outputs, and the bias persists across languages, code, and detector architectures. A training‑free operator can relocate the bias but cannot erase it, underscoring that the unfairness is a structural cost of out‑of‑distribution generalization.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4
Less Is Moral: A CHARMing Framework for Moral Foundations Detection in Endorsement Behaviour
The paper introduces CHARM, a lightweight fine‑tuned language model framework for detecting moral foundations in text. CHARM combines MAC cross‑attention, rationale alignment, and hate‑speech modulation to operationalize distinct psychological constructs, achieving up to 15.3% higher AUC in‑domain and outperforming supervised baselines on all out‑of‑domain datasets. The authors demonstrate CHARM’s scalability by applying it to large‑scale COVID‑19 Twitter data, revealing a strong link between moral value alignment and online endorsement behavior.
arXiv AI
Aug 10
Measuring Concept Content in Text from LLM Activations: ESG Evidence from Concept Vectors and Linear Probes
arXiv:2608. 07208v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing measures of how much a text is about a concept read the surface of the text: dictionary word shares, topic proportions, embedding similarities.
arXiv AI
Aug 17
Split the Labor: Separating Evidence Interpretation from Decision Aggregation
arXiv:2608. 14509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Systems that ask a language model to reach a conclusion from many sources usually concatenate them into one prompt.