arXiv:2607. 14846v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current voice AI benchmarks typically evaluate isolated capabilities such as speech intelligibility, word error rate, or text-based dialogue quality, but they rarely test whether systems harness the acoustic information that distinguishes spoken language from its textual representation.
By David Ayllon, Alice Baird, Jeffrey Brooks, Franc Camps-Febrer, Jakub Piotr C{\l}apa, Theo Lebryk, Jens Madsen, Olya Ossipova, Sharath Rao, Hoon Shin, Tigran Soghbatyan, Georg Streich, Rashish Tandon, Panagiotis Tzirakis
arXiv:2606. 19951v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mean opinion score (MOS) prediction models are widely used as proxy metrics in text-to-speech (TTS) research, yet their ability to capture quality differences beyond acoustic fidelity remains unclear.
By Masato Takagi, Masaya Kawamura, Reo Shimizu, Yuma Shirahata
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have been widely used as judge models for the automatic evaluation of generated speech. However, prior approaches predominantly focus on holistic naturalness, leaving fine-grained paralinguistic distinctions underexplored.
arXiv:2608. 09930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Models (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive.
By Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Simon Rosen, Jash Shah, Lindsay Devon Brin, Hoang H Nguyen, Anke Koelzer, Rachel Hansen, Tara Bogavelli, Fanny Riols
arXiv:2609.18533v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems exhibit unequal error rates across speaker groups, motivating interventions on their internal representation...
By Nicolas Bourrel, Abderrahmane Issam, Gerasimos Spanakis
arXiv:2601.09050v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Tonal low-resource languages are widely spoken but remain underserved by modern speech technologies. A central challenge is learning speech represe...
By Tianyi Xu, Xuan Ouyang, Binwei Yao, Shoua Xiong, Sara Misurelli, Maichou Lor, Junjie Hu
arXiv:2609.14743v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Pure speech language models often lag behind text and speech-text language models in generating coherent content, but this gap is difficult to quantify...
By Ju-Chieh Chou, Jiawei Zhou, Karen Livescu
arXiv:2608.27783v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Speech language models (speech LLMs) can generate plausible outputs from audio that contains no usable speech evidence. We study this failure...
By Mengzhe Geng
arXiv:2608.21176v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Automatic speech quality assessment aims to predict Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) consistent with human subjective perception and is essential for evalua...
By Naiyuan Li, Li Dong, Diqun Yan
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems exhibit unequal error rates across speaker groups, motivating interventions on their internal representations. We ask whether speaker-linked attributes that...
Current speech translation systems, including SpeechLLMs, are trained on cleaned text and tend to strip disfluencies like filled pauses and false starts rather than translate them. We show this comes at a cost: disfluencies carry meaning that gets lost when speech is cleaned up.
The paper introduces Prosodic Adjustment with Conversational Context (PACC), a deep‑learning method that converts read speech into natural conversational speech. PACC analyzes and modifies prosodic features—intonation, stress, and rhythm—using HiFi‑GAN for synthesis, aiming to preserve naturalness and intelligibility while keeping computational load low for real‑time use. Experiments show significant improvements in speech conversion, higher model accuracy, and better Mean Opinion Score (MOS) results, establishing new benchmarks for the task.
By Parshav Singla, Agnik Banerjee, Aaditya Arora, Shruti Aggarwal, Anil Kumar Verma, Vikram C M, Raj Prakash Gohil, Gopal Kumar Agarwal