arXiv:2607. 23050v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural scaling laws describe how loss decreases as models, data, and compute grow, but they do not answer a prior question: for a fixed task, what is the minimum model capacity required to solve it?
By Byeong Hoon Yoon
arXiv:2608. 28150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Which geometry controls the rank complexity of normalized softmax attention?
By Yuhe Sui, Jianing Zhang
The paper introduces a low‑rank framework for ranking large language models (LLMs) on task‑specific benchmarks using sparse pairwise comparisons. By modeling the task‑by‑model ability matrix as low rank, the method shares information across related tasks while preserving task‑specific differences, and it provides uncertainty‑aware ranking through debiased estimators and simultaneous confidence sets. Experiments on synthetic data and the Chatbot Arena benchmark demonstrate improved sample efficiency and tighter, better‑calibrated ranking certificates, especially in the sparse comparison regime typical of real LLM evaluations.
By Jiachun Li, David Simchi-Levi, Will Wei Sun
arXiv:2607. 27680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become the standard mechanism for fine-tuning large pretrained models, yet its statistical properties remain only partially understood.
By Arunan J
arXiv:2607. 20205v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models.
By Yihang Gao, Vincent Y. F. Tan
arXiv:2605. 05189v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: How many key-value associations can a $d\times d$ linear memory store?
By Nicholas Barnfield, Juno Kim, Eshaan Nichani, Jason D. Lee, Yue M. Lu
arXiv:2608. 19171v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep models for irregularly-sampled time series answer queries at arbitrary continuous timestamps, yet report nothing about how far each answer should be trusted.
By Sotirios P. Chatzis, Loukas Papadoulas
arXiv:2607. 11146v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the coupled objective J_K^WOR = E_{S ~ PL-WOR_K}[max_{i in S} R_i]: the expected maximum reward of a size-K Plackett-Luce draw without replacement, the law of Gumbel-Top-K / Stochastic Beam Search decoding.
By Melveena Jolly, Midhun Xavier
Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) incur quadratic self-attention cost over spatiotemporal tokens. Existing training-free sparse attention methods often construct sparse masks from block-level or cluster-level proxy scores, which can obscure fine-grained differences among keys and miss high contribution keys under aggressive sparsity.
arXiv:2602. 18849v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We develop a sensitivity analysis for transformer attention in a geometry aligned with tokenwise computation.
By Seyed Morteza Emadi
Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models. Since different modules and layers may contribute unequally to downstream adaptation, allocating rank resources under a fixed parameter budget is an important problem for balancing efficiency, expressiveness, and generalization.
arXiv:2608. 03294v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the problem of learning multi-head softmax attention from black-box input-output access.
By Sunyeop Kim, Insung Kim, Jian Guo