arXiv Machine Learning

Architecture Alignment With Sparse Priors in Tabular Foundation Models

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Understanding the Surprising Generalization Properties of Tabular Foundation Models

The paper investigates how Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) can achieve strong transfer learning by self‑supervised pre‑training on a single real table. It finds that a table’s usefulness is largely determined by its number of features rather than instances, and that fine‑grained column‑level preprocessing improves downstream performance while dataset‑level filtering does not. The authors propose that tabular in‑context generalization is primarily retrieval‑based, with models learning to identify and aggregate relevant examples from the provided context.

By Nour Shaheen, Junwei Ma, Alex Labach, Frank Hutter, Valentin Thomas, Anthony L. Caterini
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

Understanding the Surprising Generalization Properties of Tabular Foundation Models

The paper investigates how Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) can achieve strong transfer learning by self‑supervised pre‑training on a single real table, rather than large synthetic or real datasets. It finds that a table’s usefulness for downstream tasks is mainly determined by the number of features, not instances, and that fine‑grained column‑level preprocessing improves performance while dataset‑level filtering does not. The authors propose a task‑centric, retrieval‑based view of in‑context generalization, suggesting that effective TFMs identify and aggregate relevant examples from the provided context.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

From Synthetic Priors to Model Behavior: Structural Coverage in Tabular Foundation Models

The paper investigates how synthetic pretraining priors used in tabular foundation models (TFMs) influence downstream performance. By reconstructing the synthetic data generators of four TFMs and comparing their generated tasks to two popular tabular benchmarks using structural descriptors, the authors measure structural coverage and normalized density. They find that some generators provide broader and denser support for benchmark tasks, and that stronger synthetic-to-benchmark support generally correlates with better model performance.

By He Zhao, Ryan Thompson, Daniel M. Steinberg, Ashfaqur Rahman, Edwin V. Bonilla, Cheng Soon Ong
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

SOMTab: Set-Order Mamba for Efficient Tabular In-Context Learning

SOMTab is a Set-Order Mamba architecture designed for efficient tabular in-context learning. It separates representation construction from query-conditioned retrieval, using Mamba-based state‑space mixing to build compact row and column representations while retaining attention for final prediction. The model, along with a synthetic prior called DCH‑TailMix, achieves performance comparable to Transformer‑based tabular foundation models but with faster inference and lower GPU memory usage.

By Hao Wang, Siyu Zhang, Wei Ma
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

What Do Tabular Foundation Models Compute In Context? In-Situ Representation Refinement through Attention-Gated Updates

The paper introduces RefineICL, an attention‑gated, feed‑forward‑network‑free framework that refines representations in situ for tabular foundation models. By using support labels to guide episode‑specific updates, the method transfers learned corrections to unlabeled queries without altering model parameters, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance on AMLB29 and TabArena benchmarks. Experiments and internal interventions demonstrate that intermediate support updates are essential for constructing task‑specific predictors in context.

By Tian Zhou, Beverly Jin, Linxiao Yang, Xue Wang, Wenwei Wang, Bingqing Peng, Mengni Ye, Jinjie Gu, Liang Sun
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4

LimiX-2M: Mitigating Low-Rank Collapse and Attention Bottlenecks in Tabular Foundation Models

arXiv:2606. 04485v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models (TFMs) increasingly rival tree ensembles, but their performance is often compute-inefficient: with standard affine scalar tokenization, each feature injects value variation through an essentially one-dimensional channel, and feature IDs/positional signals cannot increase within-feature value degrees of freedom, yielding weak early-layer value sensitivity and redundant hidden states.

By Yuanrui Wang, Xingxuan Zhang, Han Yu, Mingchao Ming, Gang Ren, Hao Yuan, Li Mao, Yunjia Zhang, Chun Yuan, Peng Cui
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

CRISP: Cliff-awaRe Input-adaptive Sparse Prefilling with Structural-Mass-Motivated Routing

CRISP (Cliff-awaRe Input-adaptive Sparse Prefilling) is a new method for long-context LLM inference that replaces costly quadratic attention prefilling with a dynamic, input-adaptive sparse routing scheme. It introduces a structural proxy, C_struct, to directly read routing decisions from the proxy attention map, eliminating the need for pooled matrix multiplication and KL divergence. Additionally, CRISP addresses the post-softmax mass cliff by using a sink-aware threshold based on the noise floor, theoretically reducing background noise accumulation to O(n). Empirical results on InfiniteBench, RULER, and LongBench show that CRISP outperforms existing sparse methods and can match or exceed exact dense attention, achieving up to a 5.30× speedup at 512k tokens and significant gains on retrieval-heavy tasks.

By Huu Huy Nguyen, Chien Van Nguyen, Franck Dernoncourt, Ryan A. Rossi, Linh Ngo Van, Jieyang Chen, Thien Huu Nguyen