arXiv AI

Now You See the Hate: Adaptive View Retrieval for Hidden Hateful Illusions

arXiv:2607. 19061v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hateful optical illusions expose a serious gap in current multimodal safety systems.

arXiv AI
Aug 7

Innocent Panels, Hateful Stories: Evaluating and Detecting Hateful Intent in Multi-Turn Visual Story Generation

arXiv:2608. 05210v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Picture books and comics have long been used to disseminate hateful narratives because they are easily understood even by children, as exemplified by the notorious Nazi propaganda picture book \emph{Der Giftpilz}.

By Ye Leng, Junjie Chu, Yiting Qu, Mingjie Li, Yun Shen, Yang Zhang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 7

AEGIS: A Mechanism-Guided Defense against Visual Synonym Jailbreaks in Text-to-Image Models

Text-to-image diffusion models have achieved high visual fidelity and broad adoption, but remain vulnerable to safety violations when adversaries exploit them to synthesize illicit content. Existing alignment paradigms, from input sanitization to structural feature pruning, are largely organized around unsafe concepts explicitly exposed during filtering, editing, or localization.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

When Seeing Overrides Knowing: Visual Dominance and Deferral-Based Method for Personalized Safety in VLMs

The paper introduces MPS-Bench, a benchmark of 5,181 scenarios from 584 real-world images across 12 high-risk domains, each paired with a hidden user profile, to evaluate personalized safety in vision‑language models (VLMs). Eight leading VLMs were tested and found to almost always respond directly (86‑99%) without seeking missing context, scoring no higher than 2.6/5 on personalized safety. The authors identify a phenomenon called visual dominance, where visual information enters text representations early and suppresses textual risk signals, and propose PRISM, a lightweight input monitor that predicts when a query should be deferred, achieving 0.978 AUC and outperforming all tested models on the safety‑utility Pareto frontier.

By Edward Sun, Yuchen Wu, Zixian Ma, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Yijia Xiao, Xiaoyuan Yi, Ranjay Krishna, Wei Wang, Jindong Wang, Aylin Caliskan
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

Can Tainted Pixels Expose Deepfake Videos?

The paper introduces TaintedPixels, a proactive video‑protection technique that embeds subtle, structured perturbations into the blue channel of facial regions. These perturbations remain invisible in the original video but become noticeable after black‑box manipulation, thereby flagging deepfakes. Experiments on three off‑the‑shelf manipulation tools and two detectors show that TaintedPixels achieves the highest forgery detection rate while keeping visual distortion minimal (LPIPS = 0.0042), and a human study confirms that protected videos are rarely suspected, whereas forgeries from protected sources are identified as fake far more often than those from unprotected sources.

By Juan Hu, Shaojing Fan, Sanjay Saha, Marc Herrera, Terence Sim
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 23

The Temporal Moderation Gap: Text-to-Video Safety Filters Are Blind to Harm in Motion

The paper identifies a flaw in current text-to-video safety filters that rely on keyword prompts and per-frame checks, showing that these systems miss harms that arise solely from the ordering of frames. Experiments reveal that a significant portion of generated videos contain harmful content that is undetected because each individual frame appears safe, and prompt engineering does not mitigate this issue. The authors propose an order-aware detector that can distinguish harmful videos from benign shuffles, achieving an AUC of 0.74 compared to chance for per-frame checking.

By Yuxin Cao, Fusen Guo, Yuezhong Wu, Huadong Mo, Wei Song
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Learn Before You Judge: Progressive Knowledge-to-Decision Alignment for Explainable Hateful Meme Detection

The paper introduces ProKDA, a progressive knowledge-to-decision alignment framework for explainable hateful meme detection. ProKDA separates explanation generation and label prediction into three sequential training stages—background knowledge learning, hatefulness detection learning, and hatefulness boundary alignment—reducing task interference. Experiments on three public benchmarks demonstrate that ProKDA achieves state‑of‑the‑art detection performance while providing accurate, evidence‑supported explanations for moderation decisions.

By Bo Xu, Chenyuan Wang, Xinyu Chen, Quanhao Zhu, Rui Lin, Liang Zhao, Hongfei Lin, Feng Xia