arXiv:2607. 00032v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many information systems are built around documents: self-contained units optimised for print production and linear reading.
By Mathilde Noual
arXiv:2509. 02581v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the growing availability of tools designed to support scholarly knowledge extraction and organization, many researchers still rely on manual methods, sometimes due to unfamiliarity with existing technologies or limited access to domain-adapted solutions.
By Azanzi Jiomekong, Hande K\"u\c{c}\"uk McGinty, Keith G. Mills, Allard Oelen, Enayat Rajabi, Harry McElroy, Antrea Christou, Anmol Saini, Janice Anta Zebaze, Hannah Kim, Anna M. Jacyszyn, Gollam Rabby, Dirk Betz, Claudia Biniossek, Sanju Tiwari, S\"oren Auer
arXiv:2503. 00069v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on producing responses that meet human expectations and align with shared values - a process coined alignment.
By Karolina Sta\'nczak, Nicholas Meade, Mehar Bhatia, Hattie Zhou, Konstantin B\"ottinger, Jeremy Barnes, Jason Stanley, Jessica Montgomery, Richard Zemel, Nicolas Papernot, Nicolas Chapados, Denis Therien, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Ana Marasovi\'c, Sylvie Delacroix, Gillian K. Hadfield, Siva Reddy
arXiv:2506. 17467v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential to change how we write, communicate, and create, leading to rapid adoption across society.
By Weixin Liang
arXiv:2609.16856v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: English Wikipedia is one of the largest examples of collective intelligence on the Web, sustained not only by article production but also by voluntee...
By Neal Reeves, Maja \'Swieczkowska, Amy Rechkemmer, Elena Simperl
arXiv:2509. 25397v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The proliferation of open large language models (LLMs) is fostering a vibrant ecosystem in artificial intelligence (AI).
By Johan Lin{\aa}ker, Cailean Osborne, Jennifer Ding, Ben Burtenshaw
arXiv:2607. 05420v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study examines how alternative systems of scholarly representation identify and characterize broad public administration (PA) and artificial intelligence related public administration (AI-in-PA) scholarship.
By Shaoming Cheng, Laurie Schintler
The paper reviews secondary studies and research agendas on generative AI (GenAI) in information systems, synthesizing evidence from 28 selected papers. It identifies GenAI’s transformative benefits—productivity, innovation, personalization, and democratized expertise—while highlighting challenges such as technical unreliability, ethical risks, and governance gaps. The authors propose a research agenda that shifts IS scholarship toward shaping the co‑evolution of AI capabilities with organizational routines, societal values, and regulatory institutions, emphasizing hybrid human‑AI ensembles, situated validation, design principles for probabilistic systems, and adaptive governance.
By Aleksander Jarz\k{e}bowicz, Adam Przyby{\l}ek, Jacinto Estima, Yen Ying Ng, Jakub Swacha, Beata Zielosko, Lech Madeyski, Noel Carroll, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Bartosz Marcinkowski, Alberto Rodrigues da Silva, Viktoria Stray, Netta Iivari, Anh Nguyen-Duc, Jorge Melegati, Boris Deliba\v{s}i\'c, Emilio Insfran
arXiv:2606. 29727v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Professional translation is often a team-based process: translators, reviewers, and project managers must coordinate terminology, legal force, and accountability across documents.
By Ziyang Lian, Qingya Zhang, Hao Wang, Huiwen Xiong, Qi Yang, Lingyi Meng, Xiaoyi Gu, Rui Wang
Professional translation is often a team-based process: translators, reviewers, and project managers must coordinate terminology, legal force, and accountability across documents. Yet many LLM-based translation tools treat human corrections as isolated edits.
arXiv:2607. 02609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For decades, data engineering has developed mature architectural principles for integrating, governing, validating, cataloging, and serving organizational data.
By Mariano Garralda-Barrio
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results. This paper presents an on-going use case developed within the European project LLMs4EU and the ALT-EDIC infrastructure, aimed at adapting foundation models to SSH research practices and supporting tasks such as question answering, comparative document analysis and literature review.