arXiv AI

Measuring Explainer Stability via Attribution Separability

arXiv:2608. 02697v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Attribution methods (AMs) assign an importance score to each feature and are widely adopted to explain black-box models.

arXiv AI
Jun 2

A Monosemantic Attribution Framework for Stable Interpretability in Clinical Neuroscience Transformer-Based Language Models

arXiv:2601. 17952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Interpretability remains a key challenge for deploying language models (LM) in clinical settings such as progression diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, where early and trustworthy predictions are essential.

By Michail Mamalakis, Tiago Azevedo, Cristian Cosentino, Chiara D'Ercoli, Subati Abulikemu, Zhongtian Sun, Richard Bethlehem, Pietro Lio
arXiv AI
Jul 17

Towards a Unified Multidimensional Explainability Metric: Evaluating Trustworthiness in AI Models

arXiv:2607. 14315v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for assessing the explainability of various XAI methods, such as LIME and SHAP, across multiple datasets and machine learning models, with the ultimate goal of creating a unified multidimensional explainability score.

By Georgios Makridis, Georgios Fatouros, Athanasios Kiourtis, Dimitrios Kotios, Vasileios Koukos, Dimosthenis Kyriazis, Jonh Soldatos
arXiv AI
Aug 10

MAC: A Conversion Rate Prediction Benchmark Featuring Labels Under Multiple Attribution Mechanisms

arXiv:2603. 02184v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-attribution learning (MAL), which enhances model performance by learning from conversion labels yielded by multiple attribution mechanisms, has emerged as a promising learning paradigm for conversion rate (CVR) prediction.

By Jinqi Wu, Sishuo Chen, Zhangming Chan, Yong Bai, Lei Zhang, Sheng Chen, Chenghuan Hou, Xiang-Rong Sheng, Han Zhu, Jian Xu, Bo Zheng, Chaoyou Fu