arXiv Machine Learning

RELISH: LLM REgression with a Latent Iterative State Head

arXiv:2604. 01206v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present RELISH (REgression with a Latent Iterative State Head), a novel, lightweight architecture designed for text regression with large language models.

arXiv AI
Jun 10

PromptEmbedder: Efficient and Transferable Text Embedding via Dual-LLM Soft Prompting

arXiv:2605. 28066v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in text embedding, yet current adaptation methods like LoRA face significant bottlenecks in computational efficiency and cross-architecture transferability.

By Yu-Che Tsai, Kuan-Yu Chen, Yuan-Hao Chen, Yu-Han Chang, Ching-Yu Tsai, Yu-Hsiang Chuang, Shou-De Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Accelerating LLM Inference via Vector Index Based Output Embeddings

The paper proposes replacing dense output projection in large language models with an HNSW-based vector index to perform maximum inner product search over token embeddings. This approach reduces memory bandwidth usage by retrieving only a small set of high-scoring tokens and can be integrated into existing decoding pipelines via sparse logits scattering. Experiments on Gemma 3, Llama 3.2, and Qwen 3 show up to 82% speed‑up in batch‑size‑one decoding while maintaining generation quality.

By Martin Loretz, Sepp Hochreiter
arXiv AI
3d ago

On the (In)effectiveness of AMR Augmentation for Large Language Models

The paper investigates whether adding Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) data to large language models (LLMs) improves performance on downstream tasks. By reproducing recent studies and applying a consistent hyperparameter protocol, the authors find that text-only baselines match or surpass AMR-augmented models. A perplexity-based probe shows that AMR does not provide LLMs with additional relational knowledge, suggesting no clear benefit from AMR augmentation.

By Hoa Quynh Nhung Nguyen, Jacopo Staiano, Michael Sullivan
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

Osprey: Target-agnostic Pre-training Makes Stronger Drafters in Speculative Decoding

Osprey is a target‑agnostic pre‑training method that bootstraps draft models for speculative decoding from existing small language models. By pruning to a shallow backbone, restoring language‑modeling capability with next‑token pretraining, and adapting via vocabulary alignment and distillation, Osprey reduces per‑target work to a lightweight adaptation step. Experiments show that a single Osprey backbone improves mean acceptance length by up to 22.7% and increases tokens per second by 17.5% across several large target models, especially on out‑of‑domain and multilingual data.

By Fengxiang Bie, Yuqing Jian, Yifan Yu, Zhongzhu Zhou, Zelei Shao, Ben Athiwaratkun, Shuaiwen Leon Song, Chenfeng Xu, Xiaoxia Wu, Tianyi Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 7

How Much is Left? LLMs Linearly Encode Their Remaining Output Length

arXiv:2607. 05316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models generate one token at a time, yet their responses show remarkably consistent length structure: step-by-step solutions converge in predictable token counts, retrievals stop after a few sentences, retractions extend responses by measurable amounts.

By Mohamed Amine Merzouk, Dmitri Carpov, Mirko Bronzi, Damiano Fornasiere, Adam Oberman
arXiv AI
Jul 7

IndexMem: Learned KV-Cache Eviction with Latent Memory for Long-Context LLM Inference

arXiv:2605. 25475v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to operate over long contexts, yet standard softmax attention incurs a KV cache that grows linearly with sequence length, quickly becoming the bottleneck for long context inference.

By Xintong Yang, Hao Gu, Binxing Xu, Lujun Li, Bei Liu, Jiacheng Liu, Qiyuan Zhu, Yike Guo, Sirui Han
arXiv AI
Jul 15

Scaling Point-in-Time Language Models

arXiv:2607. 11889v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models trained on unrestricted internet corpora inevitably embed information from the future, introducing lookahead bias that compromises the validity of backtests and causal inference in finance and the social sciences.

By Bryan Kelly, Semyon Malamud, Johannes Schwab, Teng Andrea Xu