arXiv:2608. 12306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe offline RL typically assumes access to dense per-step cost annotations, but in practice supervisors provide only trajectory-level stop-feedback: a binary signal at the first unsafe transition, with no per-step attribution.
By Ebenezer Gelo (University of the Witwatersrand), Geraud Nangue Tasse (University of the Witwatersrand), Steven James (University of the Witwatersrand), Benjamin Rosman (University of the Witwatersrand)
arXiv:2504. 12557v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Ensuring safe behavior in reinforcement learning (RL) is challenging when safety constraints are implicit and cannot be densely measured.
By Siow Meng Low, Ze Gong, Akshat Kumar
The paper introduces Q-learning Penalized Transformer (QPT), a training–inference consistent framework for safe offline reinforcement learning. QPT trains a Transformer policy that generates actions conditioned on trajectory context and target return/cost while incorporating a Q-shaped penalty to balance safety, reward maximization, and behavior regularization. The method consistently outperforms strong baselines on 38 DSRL benchmark tasks and adapts robustly to varying constraint thresholds.
arXiv:2609.34426v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of safe offline reinforcement learning, which involves training a policy to satisfy safety constraints using an of...
By Shengchao Hu, Peng Wang, Jifeng Hu, Qiyang Zhou, Anning Hu, Li Shen, Ya Zhang, Dacheng Tao
arXiv:2510. 12560v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: End-to-end autonomous driving models trained with imitation learning (IL) often generalize poorly, particularly in long-tail scenarios where expert demonstrations are sparse.
By Xiaoji Zheng, Ziyuan Yang, Yanhao Chen, Yuhang Peng, Yuanrong Tang, Gengyuan Liu, Bokui Chen, Jiangtao Gong
arXiv:2603. 05995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Off-road autonomous driving poses significant challenges such as navigating unmapped, variable terrain with uncertain and diverse dynamics.
By Zhouchonghao Wu, Raymond Song, Vedant Mundheda, Luis E. Navarro-Serment, Christof Schoenborn, Jeff Schneider
arXiv:2606. 32027v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reward design remains a central bottleneck for autonomous robot policy improvement, especially in long-horizon manipulation tasks where sparse success labels provide too little signal and binary preferences collapse many competing notions of quality into one ambiguous signal.
By Marcel Torne, Anubha Mahajan, Abhijnya Bhat, Chelsea Finn
arXiv:2603. 05296v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) allows robots to learn from offline datasets without risky exploration.
By Hokyun Im, Andrey Kolobov, Jianlong Fu, Youngwoon Lee
arXiv:2609.15883v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning aims to learn a policy solely from fixed datasets, which often contain multimodal action distributions. Flow policies...
By Jaehun Shon, Jinha Choi, Jongwook Jeon, Jongmin Lee
arXiv:2606. 24231v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal driving planning faces a long-standing tension between two paradigms: scoring-based methods benefit from dense reward supervision but are confined to a fixed action vocabulary, while anchor-based methods generate proposals dynamically yet suffer from sparse supervision constrained to a single ground-truth trajectory.
By Xirui Li, Zhe Liu, Xiaoqing Ye, Wenhua Han, Yifeng Pan, Junyu Han, Hengshuang Zhao
arXiv:2606. 18531v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning is typically analyzed under process-level reward supervision, yet many sequential decision datasets record only trajectory-level outcomes.
By Xuanfei Ren, Tengyang Xie
arXiv:2608.30122v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) driving methods increasingly combine multi-trajectory imitation learning with group-relative policy optimization (GRPO),...
By Tian Zhang, Zhuo Huang, Hongrui Ye, Yu Wu, Zengmao Wang, Kaixuan Zhou