arXiv Computer Vision

Bridging Adversarial and Collaborative Learning for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

PreResQ-R1: Response-Preference Disentangled Ranking-and-Scoring Reinforcement Optimization for Robust Visual Quality Assessment

PreResQ‑R1 introduces a Preference‑Response Disentangled Reinforcement Learning framework for Visual Quality Assessment that jointly optimizes absolute score regression and relative ranking consistency. It employs a dual‑branch reward system—modeling intra‑sample response coherence and inter‑sample preference alignment—trained with Group Relative Policy Optimization. The method extends to video quality assessment via a global‑temporal and local‑spatial data flow strategy, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on 10 IQA and 5 VQA benchmarks with only 6K images and 28K videos, and provides human‑aligned reasoning traces.

By Zehui Feng, Weichuan Wang, Xiaohan Chen, Ting Han
arXiv AI
Sep 30

Mutually Adversarial Self-Training with Evolving Data for Unified Multimodal Models

The paper introduces MATE, a reinforcement‑learning‑based post‑training framework for unified multimodal models that lets the generation and understanding branches challenge each other instead of cooperating. In MATE, each branch proposes candidate outputs that the other must reproduce, and the solver is trained on the worst‑handled candidate, creating an evolving adversarial loop without a separate adversary. Experiments on Janus‑Pro‑1B show that MATE improves generation and understanding metrics, including GenEval (+2.4), DPG‑Bench (+1.7), and an average of nine understanding benchmarks (+0.7), while enhancing consistency across image‑text cycles.

By Wentao Zhou, Weijie Gan, Jiayun Wang
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 5

DEPICT: Scoring Text-to-Image Alignment by Answer Agreement

DEPICT is a new training‑free metric for evaluating text‑to‑image alignment. It replaces fixed reference answers with an agreement rule that compares image‑based and caption‑only responses, weighting questions by how decisively the caption determines them. By merging this agreement score with a holistic score, DEPICT improves negation accuracy dramatically and outperforms existing training‑free metrics while matching or exceeding fine‑tuned evaluators on several benchmarks.

By Vasco Ramos, Sandra Godinho Silva, Joao Magalhaes, Ricardo Rei, Pedro Henrique Martins
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 23

LLaVA-Assessor: Building the Foundation LMM For Visual Quality Assessment

LLaVA‑Assessor is a unified large multi‑modal model (LMM) designed for visual quality assessment, combining image and video inputs. It introduces a two‑task framework—quality interpretation and quality scoring—supported by an adaptive architecture, a rigorous human‑annotated dataset, and a machine‑synthesized data expansion pipeline. The model employs a prompt‑disentanglement strategy to stabilize multi‑task training and achieves strong performance across 11 quality scoring test sets and 4 interpretation benchmarks.

By Ziheng Jia, Zicheng Zhang, Jiaying Qian, Guangtao Zhai, Xiongkuo Min
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Decoupling Semantics from Distortions: Multi-Scale Two-Stream Vision-Language Alignment for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment

arXiv:2606. 16799v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing vision-language model (VLM)-based AI-generated image quality assessment (AIGIQA) methods suffer from a fundamental semantic-distortion dimensional conflict: monolithic representations optimized for semantic discrimination inherently entangle compositional understanding with low-level perceptual sensitivity, rendering them blind to fine-grained quality degradations.

By Zijie Meng