arXiv:2610.19042v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding the mechanism behind why diffusion models memorize their training data remains an open question in generative modeling. In this paper, we...
The paper investigates why diffusion models, despite their practical success, can fully memorize training data when optimal. It shows that as training proceeds, the denoising objective causes overfitting at intermediate noise levels, creating a gap between validation and training performance. In a 2D toy model, this gap arises from the interplay between model error and the data distribution’s support density, leading to a smooth, generalizing flow field rather than exact recall of training points. The study also reveals that predictions from intermediate inference states become increasingly similar to training data in feature space, even as overall similarity to validation data remains unchanged.
arXiv:2310. 05264v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In this work, we investigate an intriguing and prevalent phenomenon of diffusion models which we term as "consistent model reproducibility": given the same starting noise input and a deterministic sampler, different diffusion models often yield remarkably similar outputs.
The paper demonstrates that diffusion models encode memorization in the geometry of their learned energy landscape before it becomes visible in generated samples. By analyzing score divergence and basin volume, the authors show that localized basins form around training images early in training, and that cyclic denoising can recover these images even when one‑shot generation shows no copies. Experiments on Gaussian mixtures, CelebA, CIFAR‑10, and Stable Diffusion v1.4 confirm that basin geometry reveals memorization across various settings.
The paper investigates when language diffusion models, specifically Uniform-based Discrete Diffusion Models (UDDMs), shift from memorizing training data to generalizing to new data. It shows that UDDMs act as associative memories, forming basins of attraction around stored examples without requiring an explicit energy function. By measuring token recovery and conditional entropy, the authors identify a sharp transition governed by training set size, where memorization (vanishing entropy) gives way to generalization (finite entropy).
The paper introduces a new method for training data attribution in diffusion models called TID, which uses a local score discrepancy measure and can be estimated without retraining. It further distills this approach into TIDE, a forward‑only student that reproduces the teacher’s rankings using internal activations, achieving comparable accuracy at dramatically lower query cost. Experiments on CIFAR‑10, ArtBench‑10, and MS‑COCO show that TID outperforms existing methods and TIDE attributes samples in milliseconds, faster than generation itself.
arXiv:2606. 09718v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable generative capabilities and have also emerged as powerful self-supervised representation learners, yet the connection between these two abilities remains less explored.
arXiv:2510. 17917v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific training samples from a trained model.
arXiv:2602. 02908v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models trained on different, non-overlapping subsets of a dataset often produce strikingly similar outputs when given the same noise seed.
arXiv:2512. 20963v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion models excel at generating high-quality, diverse samples, yet they risk memorizing training data when overfit to the training objective.
The paper investigates diffusion models trained in a lazy high‑dimensional regime, extending benign overfitting theory to generative settings. By analyzing denoising score matching in a vector‑valued RKHS with an inner‑product kernel, the authors derive exact risk trajectories under gradient flow when the number of samples scales proportionally with dimensionality. These trajectories reveal three distinct phases—spectral generalization, noise‑dominated interpolation, and empirical Bayes memorization—whose interplay shapes the distribution of generated samples.
arXiv:2609.37974v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Masked diffusion models (MDMs) generate text by unmasking several tokens per step, but they are trained and sampled under different conditions. The m...