arXiv Machine Learning

ProVe: Proposer-Verifier Decoding

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 15

JetSpec++: Foresight Parallel Drafting with Self Refinements

arXiv:2610.19792v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding's effectiveness is governed by two quantities: the acceptance rate of drafted tokens and the cost of producing them. We show the t...

By Zhaoxiang Feng (UC San Diego), Lanxiang Hu (UC San Diego), Haoran Yuan (UIUC), Yu-Yang Qian (Nanjing University), Jihui Yang (Meta), Peng Zhao (Nanjing University), Yibo Zhu (StepFun), Tajana Rosing (UC San Diego), Hao Zhang (UC San Diego)
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 7

APEX: Speculate smarter, not deeper

The paper introduces APEX, a learned controller that improves speculative decoding for large language models by dynamically selecting the best speculation strategy and adjusting draft depth during generation. APEX uses request‑level routing among EAGLE‑3, n‑gram, and draft‑model speculation, and block‑level depth adaptation based on causal decoding signals and verifier feedback. Integrated into vLLM and tested with Qwen3‑8B, APEX achieves up to 5.24× speedup over autoregressive decoding while reducing wasted tokens by 41% compared to fixed‑depth n‑gram speculation.

By Manvi Jha, Zach Zhang, Zhichao Xu, Linbo Liu, Sai Muralidhar Jayanthi, Vinayak Arannil
arXiv AI
Aug 5

Approximate Speculative Decoding

arXiv:2608. 03447v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by verifying a draft block with a target model in parallel.

By Yuannuo Feng, Zegang Peng, Yuxin Xie, Yubing Ye, Yizhe Chen, Wenshuai Yao, Wenyong Zhou, Wang Kang
arXiv AI
Aug 26

ResiSpec: Enhancing Multi-Candidate Speculative Sampling via Residual Distribution Shaping

ResiSpec is a framework that improves speculative decoding for large language models by reshaping the residual distribution during verification. It addresses the problem of residual drift, where rejected candidates cause the target distribution to diverge from the draft model’s predictions, rendering later candidates ineffective. By aligning the verification process with the draft model’s high‑confidence regions, ResiSpec prevents candidate obsolescence and achieves up to 1.92× speedup over existing multi‑candidate methods.

By Zhi-Kai Chen, Jun-Jie Tao, Wei-Xiang Mao, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 28

One Call Ahead: Packed Self-Speculative Decoding with Diffusion Drafting

The paper introduces Packed-SS, a self‑speculative decoding schedule that combines drafting and verification into a single model call, reducing input size to linear in speculative width. By running the diffusion drafter one step ahead, the method keeps an unresolved suffix for the next iteration, avoiding the sequential wait of standard two‑call decoding. Experiments on Nemotron 3B/8B and SetDLM 1.7B demonstrate higher throughput and lower mean wall time under greedy decoding.

By Yuxiao Chen, Changxiao Cai
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Verification-Aware Training for Speculative Decoding

Verification-Aware Training (VAT) is a plug‑in framework that improves speculative decoding for large language models by simulating verification during training and using the resulting accept/reject patterns as supervision. VAT adds a lightweight binary verification head to predict whether each draft token will survive sequential verification, and replaces the fixed per‑position weighting with a verification‑adaptive schedule that keeps full weight up to the first rejection point. When applied to EAGLE‑3 and DFlash on Qwen3‑4B, Qwen3‑8B, and LLaMA‑3.1‑8B, VAT increases average acceptance length by up to 11.4% and wall‑clock speedup by up to 8.7%, yielding consistent gains across math, code, and chat benchmarks.

By Geonmo Gu, Byeongho Heo, HeeJae Jun, Yoohoon Kang, Sangmin Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 7

DLoop: Looped Speculative Decoding

The paper introduces DLoop, a looped speculative decoding technique that adaptively performs multiple drafting stages before verification, allowing a draft model to continue generating tokens while confident. By verifying all accumulated draft tokens together and training the draft model to handle its own hidden states for unverified tokens, DLoop reduces the number of target‑model forward passes needed. Experiments across several speculative decoding methods show wall‑clock speedups of 5–41 % without sacrificing lossless decoding.

By Geonmo Gu, Byeongho Heo, HeeJae Jun, Yoohoon Kang, Sangmin Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han