arXiv:2606. 00819v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse natural language tasks, yet their outputs often suffer from hallucinations -- content that is misaligned with factual information.
By Hanze Li, Jinhao You, Yichen Guo, Kai Tang, Shuangyang Xie, Xiande Huang
arXiv:2610.18141v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Omnimodal large language models (OLLMs) are susceptible to cross-modal hallucinations under audio-visual interference. We find that, for a substantial...
By Yu Mi, Licheng Pan, Jiayi Zhu, Qirui Liu, Yitong Qiao, Changtong Xu, Tao Wei, Fei Sun, Zhixuan Chu, Kui Ren
The paper examines six inference-time hallucination mitigation methods applied to three large vision-language models across four benchmarks, including MMStar. It finds that reducing hallucination rates often comes at the cost of lower informativeness—such as decreased object recall, visual coverage, and response detail—and that gains on hallucination benchmarks do not consistently translate to improved performance on fine-grained perception and reasoning tasks. The authors argue that current evaluation protocols may overstate progress by favoring conservative generation, and propose that hallucination mitigation should be assessed as a trade-off among faithfulness, informativeness, and overall capability.
By Mehrdad Fazli, Sina Mansouri, Mohit Marvania, Ziwei Zhu
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, yet they remain prone to generating hallucinations. Detecting these hallucinations is critical for deploying LLMs reliably in high-stakes applications.
arXiv:2606. 24790v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, yet they remain prone to generating hallucinations.
By Anand Kamat, Daniel Blake, Brent M. Werness
arXiv:2606. 07521v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study investigates the phenomenon of hallucinations in domain-adapted Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on the fine-tuning of the Llama-2 model with the Lamini dataset.
By Sanchita Porwal, Sai Prasath S, Xingjian Bi, Madelyn Scandlen
The paper presents a reference‑free framework for detecting hallucinations in Sinhala‑to‑English neural machine translation. It introduces a 45,000‑sample synthetic dataset created via five linguistically motivated corruption strategies and a semantic rescue mechanism that uses character‑level similarity. Using a fine‑tuned mDeBERTa‑v3 model, the authors achieve a token‑level F1 of 0.841 and demonstrate that the detector relies on the Sinhala source, not on surface artefacts, with an AUROC of 0.970 on a source‑disjoint test set. The study also benchmarks eight NMT systems, showing that hallucination rates vary by an order of magnitude across architectures.
By Navam Obeysekara, Nevidu Jayatilleke
arXiv:2606. 07537v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models hallucinate--producing fluent, confident, factually wrong outputs--with a consistency that persists across generations and scales.
By Md. Rejaul Korim Sadi, Toufiqur Rahman Tasin, Golam Mostofa Naeem
The paper investigates whether the internal hidden states of large language models can improve the detection of hallucinations in model responses. By integrating hidden states with an output‑side baseline and evaluating on both open‑ended generation and multiple‑choice tasks, the authors find that adding hidden states yields modest AUROC gains of about 0.004 and 0.039. These results suggest that while hidden states contain additional predictive information, the overall improvement over strong standalone detection methods remains limited.
By Ningzhi Li, Xiaojun Ma, Xiaofei Wang
arXiv:2604. 10697v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models frequently exhibit hallucinations: fluent and confident outputs that are factually incorrect or unsupported by the input context.
By Jakub Binkowski, Kamil Adamczewski, Tomasz Kajdanowicz
arXiv:2504. 10020v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Contrastive decoding strategies are widely used to reduce object hallucinations in multimodal large language models (MLLMs).
By Hao Yin, Guangzong Si, Zilei Wang
The paper introduces Dynamic Alignment Compensation (DAC), a training‑free inference‑time technique designed to reduce hallucinations in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs). DAC monitors cross‑modal representation drift across decoder layers and generation steps, applying lightweight residual compensation through Layer‑wise Semantic Compensation and Sequential Semantic Correction. Experiments on nine multimodal benchmarks across various LVLM backbones demonstrate that DAC consistently lowers hallucination rates while preserving overall performance.
By Kairong Yu, Zixin Zhu, Le Yu, Hongwei Wang